The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0022109020000782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithmic Trading and Market Quality: International Evidence

Abstract: We study the effect of algorithmic trading (AT) on market quality between 2001 and 2011 in 42 equity markets around the world. We use an exchange colocation service that increases AT as an exogenous instrument to draw causal inferences about AT on market quality. On average, AT improves liquidity and informational efficiency but increases short-term volatility. Importantly, AT also lowers execution shortfalls for buy-side institutional investors. Our results are surprisingly consistent across markets and thus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The speed advantage can also allow traders to react to news quickly and improves the informational efficiency of prices. These arguments find support in the empirical literature which finds that higher levels of algorithmic trading improves securities markets quality (Angel et al, 2011;Hendershott et al, 2011;Hasbrouck and Saar, 2013;Frino et al, 2014;Boehmer et al, 2012;Brogaard et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The speed advantage can also allow traders to react to news quickly and improves the informational efficiency of prices. These arguments find support in the empirical literature which finds that higher levels of algorithmic trading improves securities markets quality (Angel et al, 2011;Hendershott et al, 2011;Hasbrouck and Saar, 2013;Frino et al, 2014;Boehmer et al, 2012;Brogaard et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The effect of fast trading on volatility has been examined by several studies, some of which report the effect to be negative (Hasbrouck and Saar (2013), Brogaard, Hendershott, and Riordan (2014)), while others show it to be positive (Zhang (2010), Boehmer, Fong, and Wu (2018)). In a theoretical model, Du and Zhu (2015) predict that volatility may increase when some traders are faster than others.…”
Section: Empirical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is then declared that due to the internal commerce and its strict key components that make the merchandising sufficient and efficacious, and without it can probably make people earn wrong and lucrative money on the overhead of other work agents. This implies the capacity to bear upon the informational boon linked to the analysis of (Boehmer, Fong, & Wu, 2018). The prerogative states that for efficient merchandizing certain standards must be fulfilled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%