Abstract:We study the effect of algorithmic trading (AT) on market quality between 2001 and 2011 in 42 equity markets around the world. We use an exchange colocation service that increases AT as an exogenous instrument to draw causal inferences about AT on market quality. On average, AT improves liquidity and informational efficiency but increases short-term volatility. Importantly, AT also lowers execution shortfalls for buy-side institutional investors. Our results are surprisingly consistent across markets and thus … Show more
“…The speed advantage can also allow traders to react to news quickly and improves the informational efficiency of prices. These arguments find support in the empirical literature which finds that higher levels of algorithmic trading improves securities markets quality (Angel et al, 2011;Hendershott et al, 2011;Hasbrouck and Saar, 2013;Frino et al, 2014;Boehmer et al, 2012;Brogaard et al, 2014).…”
Previous studies find mixed results about how a fee on high order-to-trade (OTR) ratios impacts market quality. Using a natural experiment where such a fee was introduced twice for different reasons, this paper finds evidence of impact only when the implementation matched the motive. We use a difference-in-difference regression, that exploits microstructure features, to find causal evidence of lower aggregate OTR and higher market quality when the fee was used to manage limited exchange infrastructure, but little to no change in the OTRs or market quality when it was used for a regulatory need to slow down high frequency trading.
“…The speed advantage can also allow traders to react to news quickly and improves the informational efficiency of prices. These arguments find support in the empirical literature which finds that higher levels of algorithmic trading improves securities markets quality (Angel et al, 2011;Hendershott et al, 2011;Hasbrouck and Saar, 2013;Frino et al, 2014;Boehmer et al, 2012;Brogaard et al, 2014).…”
Previous studies find mixed results about how a fee on high order-to-trade (OTR) ratios impacts market quality. Using a natural experiment where such a fee was introduced twice for different reasons, this paper finds evidence of impact only when the implementation matched the motive. We use a difference-in-difference regression, that exploits microstructure features, to find causal evidence of lower aggregate OTR and higher market quality when the fee was used to manage limited exchange infrastructure, but little to no change in the OTRs or market quality when it was used for a regulatory need to slow down high frequency trading.
“…The effect of fast trading on volatility has been examined by several studies, some of which report the effect to be negative (Hasbrouck and Saar (2013), Brogaard, Hendershott, and Riordan (2014)), while others show it to be positive (Zhang (2010), Boehmer, Fong, and Wu (2018)). In a theoretical model, Du and Zhu (2015) predict that volatility may increase when some traders are faster than others.…”
Modern markets are characterized by speed differentials, with some traders being fractions of a second faster than others. Theoretical models suggest that such differentials may have both positive and negative effects on liquidity and gains from trade. We examine these effects by studying a series of exogenous weather episodes that temporarily remove the speed advantages of the fastest traders by disrupting their microwave networks. The disruptions are associated with lower adverse selection and lower trading costs. In additional analysis, we show that the long-term removal of speed differentials results in similar effects and also increases gains from trade. COMPETITION ON RELATIVE SPEED IS A DEFINING characteristic of modern markets where trading firms invest heavily to gain a speed advantage over their rivals. The race to acquire the fastest technology often leads to subsecond speed differentials among traders. A rich theoretical literature suggests that such differentials may have opposing effects on liquidity and gains from
“…It is then declared that due to the internal commerce and its strict key components that make the merchandising sufficient and efficacious, and without it can probably make people earn wrong and lucrative money on the overhead of other work agents. This implies the capacity to bear upon the informational boon linked to the analysis of (Boehmer, Fong, & Wu, 2018). The prerogative states that for efficient merchandizing certain standards must be fulfilled.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.