2013
DOI: 10.12988/ams.2013.13048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithmic scoring models

Abstract: This article is devoted to the analysis of different credit scoring modeling techniques which can be used for the large datasets processing. Credit scoring is a basis of the banking system. There are lots if information gathered in the banks' databases which should be used in the scoring. This article describes the basic methods and technologies of scoring models development for the risk management of the banking system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A remarkable, large and essential literature review was presented in the paper by Hand and Henley (1997), which discuss important issues of classification methods applied to credit scoring. Other literature reviews were also conducted but only focused on some types of classification methods and discussion of the methodologies, namely Xu et al (2009), Shi (2010), Lahsasna et al (2010a) and Nurlybayeva and Balakayeva (2013). Also, Garcia et al (2014) performed a systematic literature review, but limiting the study to papers published between 2000 and 2013, these authors provided a short experimental framework comparing only four credit scoring methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A remarkable, large and essential literature review was presented in the paper by Hand and Henley (1997), which discuss important issues of classification methods applied to credit scoring. Other literature reviews were also conducted but only focused on some types of classification methods and discussion of the methodologies, namely Xu et al (2009), Shi (2010), Lahsasna et al (2010a) and Nurlybayeva and Balakayeva (2013). Also, Garcia et al (2014) performed a systematic literature review, but limiting the study to papers published between 2000 and 2013, these authors provided a short experimental framework comparing only four credit scoring methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En los últimos años se ha venido trabajando en diferentes técnicas para abordar el riesgo crédito, por ejemplo la utilización de sistemas de inferencia borrosa en el análisis de solvencia de un cliente para pagar un crédito [7], el uso de redes de neuronas artificiales con el fin de generar un nuevo enfoque de asignación de créditos [8], la búsqueda de modelos de calificación mediante data minig [9] y el modelamiento de la dinámica que contiene la asignación de créditos en una organización [10].…”
Section: Iunclassified
“…De esta manera cualquier registro que tuviera una aprobación diferente a la predominancia del cluster, le sería asignado un valor promedio de score representativo para el cluster, haciendo que cada registro tome la predominancia del grupo en la aprobación [13] [14]. Lo anterior genera una segunda subestructura genética, que determina la segunda etapa en la construcción del modelo: w 1 w 2 …….. w NO Para evaluar la calidad de esta subestructura con respecto a la construcción del modelo de score (TKS), la función de aptitud se define: (9) Dónde: nd: indica el número de clientes que conforman la base de datos para el aprendizaje. FA 2 : indica la función de aptitud para un individuo, en términos del inverso del error cuadrático medio.…”
Section: U K+1unclassified
“…Where Score is defined as value assigned to the borrower and reflecting its relative creditworthiness (Nurlybayeva & Balakayeva, 2013 ). This approach, however, does not give an answer to the question of the probability of default of the 1 st Borrower relative to the 2 nd Borrower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%