2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2103.01369
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithmic Obstructions in the Random Number Partitioning Problem

David Gamarnik,
Eren C. Kızıldağ

Abstract: We consider the algorithmic problem of finding a near-optimal solution for the number partitioning problem (NPP). This problem appears in many practical applications, including the design of randomized controlled trials, multiprocessor scheduling, and cryptography; and is also of theoretical significance. The NPP possesses the so-called statistical-tocomputational gap: when its input X has distribution N (0, I n ), the optimal value of the NPP is Θ ( √ n2 −n ) w.h.p.; whereas the best polynomial-time algorithm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By showing the presence of OGP for m−tuples of nearly equidistant points (in B n ), they established nearly tight hardness for sequential local algorithms: their results match the computational threshold modulo factors that are polylogarithmic (in k). A similar overlap pattern (for m−tuples consisting of nearly equidistant points) was also considered by Gamarnik and Kızıldag [GK21a] in the context of random number partitioning problem (NPP), where they established hardness well below the existential threshold. (It is worth noting that [GK21a] considers m−tuples where m itself also grows in n, m = ω n (1).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By showing the presence of OGP for m−tuples of nearly equidistant points (in B n ), they established nearly tight hardness for sequential local algorithms: their results match the computational threshold modulo factors that are polylogarithmic (in k). A similar overlap pattern (for m−tuples consisting of nearly equidistant points) was also considered by Gamarnik and Kızıldag [GK21a] in the context of random number partitioning problem (NPP), where they established hardness well below the existential threshold. (It is worth noting that [GK21a] considers m−tuples where m itself also grows in n, m = ω n (1).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Such SCGs are a ubiquitous feature in many algorithmic problems (with random inputs) appearing in high-dimensional statistical inference tasks and in the study of random combinatorial structures. A partial (and certainly incomplete) list of problems with an SCG includes constraint satisfaction problems [MMZ05, ART06, ACO08], optimization problems over random graphs [GS14,COE15,GS17a] and spin glass models [CGPR19, GJW20, GJ21, GJW21], number partitioning problem [GK21a], principal component analysis [BR13, LKZ15a, LKZ15b], and the "infamous" planted clique problem [Jer92, DM15, BHK + 19]; see also the introduction of [GK21a], the recent survey [Gam21]; and the references therein.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However in these arguments, it is always possible that the structure of replicas identified is an ultrametric. Specifically, in a "star" multi-OGP [RV17, GS17,GK21b] all the replicas are pairwise equidistant. For the "ladder" OGP implementations of [Wei20,BH21], the forbidden structure is defined by applying some stopping rule to choose a finite number of solutions from a "stably evolving" sequence of algorithmic outputs.…”
Section: Necessity Of Full Branching Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using multi-OGPs, a line of work [69,43] culminating in the paper of Wein [71] tightly identified the algorithmic phase transition of maximum independent set on a sparse Erdős-Rényi graph for low degree polynomials. Multi-OGPs have also been used in [46,44] to rule out classes of algorithms for random k-SAT and the number partitioning problem well below the point where solutions exist, although these results are not tight against the best algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%