Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Computing Frontiers 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2212908.2212912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithmic methodologies for ultra-efficient inexact architectures for sustaining technology scaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An inexact fixed-point adder has been extensively studied and can be used in the exponent adder inexact adders such as lower-part-OR adders (LOA) [3], approximate mirror adders [4], approximate XOR/XNORbased adders, and equal segmentation adders [6], [7] can be found in the literature [1,2,3]. For a fast FP adder, a revised LOA adder is used, because it significantly reduces the critical path by ignoring the lower carry bits.…”
Section: Exponent Subtractormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An inexact fixed-point adder has been extensively studied and can be used in the exponent adder inexact adders such as lower-part-OR adders (LOA) [3], approximate mirror adders [4], approximate XOR/XNORbased adders, and equal segmentation adders [6], [7] can be found in the literature [1,2,3]. For a fast FP adder, a revised LOA adder is used, because it significantly reduces the critical path by ignoring the lower carry bits.…”
Section: Exponent Subtractormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inexact chips are smaller, faster and consume less energy. For inexact computing, fixed point arithmetic circuits have been already studied [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] as mentioned in the literature floating-point (FP) circuits consumes significantly more power due to its more complexity they have not been recommended for inexact computing. In computationally intensive applications FP format offers a large range dynamically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be considered wasteful for multimedia applications where the inputs are inherently noisy and the targeted result of the application is a stochastic metric, e.g., maximization of the expected signal-to-noise-ratio for a coding system or the expected recall rate for a multimedia retrieval application. A few notable exceptions that have emerged in the last few years are: (i) the notion of stochastic processors [8], [9], [98], (ii) variable-precision hardware [103] or inexact design [93], [104] and (iii) stochastic logic [99]. In the first case, the hardware is deliberately under-designed or used beyond its safety margin via techniques such as voltage overscaling in order to produce occasional errors that are software-correctable.…”
Section: Error-tolerant Architecture Hardware Components and Crosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first case, the hardware is deliberately under-designed or used beyond its safety margin via techniques such as voltage overscaling in order to produce occasional errors that are software-correctable. In the second case, arithmetic hardware (typically multiply-accumulate units) is designed to have multiple precision levels [103]; alternatively, pruning techniques (using heuristics) are derived in order to remove computational units (blocks) according to their expected impact in the precision of the results [104]. In this way, errors affect the multimedia application in a controllable manner.…”
Section: Error-tolerant Architecture Hardware Components and Crosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different techniques such as logic minimization [6], simplified full adder cells [7] or speculative circuits [8] have recently been proposed. As a proof of concept, the first inexact adders (where full adder cells have been pruned from various adder architectures) have been fabricated [9] and measurements have demonstrated up to one order of magnitude savings. However, most of those techniques are based on manual designs or tweaks, and have not yet been integrated in the standard digital flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%