2019
DOI: 10.7249/rr2708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithmic Equity: A Framework for Social Applications

Abstract: This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Community stakeholders should be involved at all stages of production, including deciding whether an application should be built, setting goals for the model, defining fairness [48], and guarding against unintended consequences after deployment [21,[49][50][51]. Improving governance is usually advocated in the form of guiding principles for AI use [25,52] or "soft governance" such as industry-organized protocols [53,54]. Regulation is not frequently advocated, although it is unclear whether this is because researchers believe regulation would be ineffective or because they prefer to focus on technical solutions.…”
Section: Strategies Are Multipurposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community stakeholders should be involved at all stages of production, including deciding whether an application should be built, setting goals for the model, defining fairness [48], and guarding against unintended consequences after deployment [21,[49][50][51]. Improving governance is usually advocated in the form of guiding principles for AI use [25,52] or "soft governance" such as industry-organized protocols [53,54]. Regulation is not frequently advocated, although it is unclear whether this is because researchers believe regulation would be ineffective or because they prefer to focus on technical solutions.…”
Section: Strategies Are Multipurposementioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 , 14 Precision equity 15 should be an integral part of precision health 16 and health AI. According to the World Economic Forum’s call for more inclusive AI infrastructure, 17 AI scientists and designers “should identify and partner with representatives of these impacted stakeholders on data collection methods, especially when identifying new or non-traditional resources for gathering data.” Algorithmic equity 18 is also an important area that needs special attention to ensure that decisions and policies made based on AI algorithms are nondiscriminatory.…”
Section: The Road Aheadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactivity between human and machine intelligence also addresses important concerns about bias and errors (Osoba et al, 2019;Osoba and Welser, 2017;Tambe, Cappelli, and Yakubovich, 2019). Humans and ML are both fallible, but they fail in different ways.…”
Section: Leveraging New Forms Of Machine Intelligence To Enhance Deci...mentioning
confidence: 99%