1993
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90150-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithmic and heuristic strategies in comprehension of complement clauses by patients with Parkinson's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that even if the initial concept of grammatical movement has been revised in more recent theories, the notion of grammatical transformation always holds a central role in almost all models of generative grammar. When studying this canonical versus non-canonical contrast several studies have shown that PD patients have difficulties interpreting non-canonical word order whereas they have near normal performance on canonical structures, such as actives and subject-relatives (Kemmerer, 1999;McNamara, Krueger, O'Quin, Clark, & Durso, 1996;Natsopoulos et al, 1993). Similar results were reported in early stages of HD.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that even if the initial concept of grammatical movement has been revised in more recent theories, the notion of grammatical transformation always holds a central role in almost all models of generative grammar. When studying this canonical versus non-canonical contrast several studies have shown that PD patients have difficulties interpreting non-canonical word order whereas they have near normal performance on canonical structures, such as actives and subject-relatives (Kemmerer, 1999;McNamara, Krueger, O'Quin, Clark, & Durso, 1996;Natsopoulos et al, 1993). Similar results were reported in early stages of HD.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…At first view, this supports the broad claim that the striatum is involved in the computation of language rules (Ullman, 2001) extending evidence from the word domain (Teichmann et al, 2005;Ullman et al, 1997) to the domain of phrasal structures. However, the striatum seems to subserve complex movement rules in syntax (see also Kemmerer, 1999;McNamara et al, 1996;Natsopoulos et al, 1993), whereas it was claimed to impact on more basic default rules in word morphology (Ullman et al, 1997). Thus, assuming that both complex and default rules represent genuine language rules in that they intervene whenever linguistic memory fails (Jackendoff, 2002;Pinker, 1999), the striatum appears to underpin distinct rule computations in distinct language domains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A unified interpretation of PD's language behavior in the present on-line electrophysiological comprehension study and in a number of off-line syntactic tasks in comprehension (Grossman et al, 1993;Natsopoulos et al, 1993) and during production (Ullman, Corkin, et al, 1997) may lie in the distinction between early automatic structure-building syntactic processes and more conscious syntactic processes, such as the generation of different verb forms (Ullman, Corkin, et al, 1997), sentence-judgment and question-answering tasks (Grossman et al, 1991(Grossman et al, , 1993, and the comprehension of sentences demanding syntactic working memory resources (Natsopoulos et al, 1993). Let us consider this interpretation in the light of studies investigating language and other cognitive functions in PD patients.…”
Section: Syntactic Processesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Three general cognitive processes have been implicated in syntactic comprehension of sentences: (1) regulation of attention, (2) working memory and (3) speed of information processing. Several authors investigated syntactic complexity (e.g., subject-object relative clauses) during sentence comprehension in basal ganglia patients (e.g., Grossman et al, 1991Grossman et al, , 1992Grossman et al, , 1993Lieberman et al, 1990Lieberman et al, , 1992Natsopoulos et al, 1993;Pickett et al, 1998). While Grossman et al (1993) initially argued that syntactic comprehension deficits result from attentional rather than syntactic deficits, Lieberman et al (1990; proposed that repeated errors on syntactically complex sentences cannot be attributed to an attention deficit, but to a working memory deficit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%