“…4 schematically it is shown that exactly linking phrases determine the type of related concepts and only semantic (linguistic) and "part-whole" relations are directly transformable into object properties. [12] In a concept map it is possible to determine the following types of relations [12]: the hierarchal relation, where two classes are related with linking phrases "is a", "is a subclass of", "is a subset of"; the instance relation, where a class is related to an instance with linking phrases "is an instance of", "is an example"; the whole-part relation where two classes are related with the linking phrase "is a part of"; the hierarchal kind relation, where two classes are related with the linking phrase "is a kind of"; the property relation, where a class or an instance is related to a property with linking phrases "characterises", "has a property", "has a property (object-property)"; the value relation, where a property is related to its value with the linking phrase "has a value"; the compliment relation where two classes are related with the linking phrase "not"; the semantic or linguistic relation, where two classes or instances are related with any other linking phrase. The algorithm for a concept map transformation into an ontology consists of 7 steps [12] during which all elements of a concept map are handled to determine their correspondence to ontology elements and made appropriate ontology constructions.…”