2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.96.025809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithm for calculations of asymptotic nuclear coefficients using phase-shift data for charged-particle scattering

Abstract: A new algorithm for the asymptotic nuclear coefficients calculation, which we call the ∆-method, is proved and developed. This method was proposed in Ref. [O. L. Ramírez Suárez and J.-M. Sparenberg, arXiv: 1602.04082 [nucl-th] (2016)] but no proof was given. We apply it to the bound state situated near the channel threshold when the Sommerfeld parameter is quite large within the experimental energy region. As a result, the value of the conventional effective-range function K l (k 2 ) is actually defined by t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the analytic decomposition of the irregular Coulomb function G η (x) can be derived from Eq. (40) and the definition (24). Indeed, the decomposition of H − η (x) is obtained by changing the signs of g + (η) and I + η (x) in Eq.…”
Section: B Analytic Structure Of Coulomb Wave Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the analytic decomposition of the irregular Coulomb function G η (x) can be derived from Eq. (40) and the definition (24). Indeed, the decomposition of H − η (x) is obtained by changing the signs of g + (η) and I + η (x) in Eq.…”
Section: B Analytic Structure Of Coulomb Wave Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the real value of C 2 presented in Ref. [11] is also erroneous. This is due to the improper manipulation with the absolute value sign for the residue off 0 .…”
Section: Version 1 Approximation Of the Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [11] the excited state was taken into account, however, the approximated analytic form of ∆ 0 (E) used by the authors ignored the existence of the pole of ∆ 0 (E) at E < 0. This fact is the reason for the wrong sign of the residue of the partial-wave scattering amplitudef 0 at the pole corresponding to the ground state.…”
Section: Version 1 Approximation Of the Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations