2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algicidal microorganisms and secreted algicides: New tools to induce microalgal cell disruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(194 reference statements)
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, these nine strains produce C6–C14 HSL, with their physiological behavior being controlled by HSL molecules (Xu et al ., 2012). Furthermore, the inducer role of QS was also pointed out for bacteria producing and secreting algicide molecules (Demuez et al ., 2015). Recently, data mining of the genome of a Rhodobacteraceae strain isolated from the microalga Prorocentrum donghaiense also provided hint of QS-regulated algicidal activity in bactera (Zheng et al ., 2015).…”
Section: Antagonistic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Interestingly, these nine strains produce C6–C14 HSL, with their physiological behavior being controlled by HSL molecules (Xu et al ., 2012). Furthermore, the inducer role of QS was also pointed out for bacteria producing and secreting algicide molecules (Demuez et al ., 2015). Recently, data mining of the genome of a Rhodobacteraceae strain isolated from the microalga Prorocentrum donghaiense also provided hint of QS-regulated algicidal activity in bactera (Zheng et al ., 2015).…”
Section: Antagonistic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Advantages of algicidal lysis include cost, elimination of need for external enzyme application during downstream processing, high selectivity, and mild extraction conditions (pH, temperature, etc.) (Demuez et al 2015). Disadvantages include the need for careful selection of microorganisms, difficulties in establishing optimized co-culturing techniques, and controlling the degree of disruption.…”
Section: Non-mechanical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…α‐Amylase, amylo‐glucosidase, cellulose, neutrase, pectinase, glycosidases, glucanases, peptidases, lipases, proteases, esterases, Β‐glucanase, and xylanase are some of the specific enzymes used for microalgalcell wall disruption . Use of enzymes for pretreatment (enzymatic pretreatment) has several advantages such as low energy input, low cost, high selectivity of enzymatic reactions, no inhibitory end products, and mild operational conditions such pH and temperature . Pretreatment with enzymes can be applied individually or in combination with other enzymes.…”
Section: Pretreatment Methods Applied To Microalgal Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%