2015
DOI: 10.36045/bbms/1442364591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic structures within subsets of Hamel and Sierpiński-Zygmund functions

Abstract: We prove the existence of an additive semigroup of cardinality 2 c contained in the intersection of the classes of Hamel functions (HF) and Sierpi«ski-Zygmund functions (SZ). In addition, we show that under certain set-theoretic assumptions the lineability of the class of Sierpi«ski-Zygmund functions (SZ) is equal to the lineability of the class of almost continuous Sierpi«ski-Zygmund functions (AC ∩ SZ). 1. Introduction The symbols N, Q, and R denote the sets of positive integers, rational and real numbers, r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the problem of the value L for ES \ SES, and related classes, have, lately, attracted the attention of several authors. (See, e.g., [9,25,32].) So far, and since the arrows in Remark 1.5 are all strict inclusions, the class SES (and thus ES) has been shown to be 2 c -lineable.…”
Section: And For All Pairsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the problem of the value L for ES \ SES, and related classes, have, lately, attracted the attention of several authors. (See, e.g., [9,25,32].) So far, and since the arrows in Remark 1.5 are all strict inclusions, the class SES (and thus ES) has been shown to be 2 c -lineable.…”
Section: And For All Pairsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(ii) In [32] it is proved that CH implies that L(SZ ∩ AC) ≥ c ++ . A quick examination of the proof reveals that the argument also works under this weaker assumption and that it actually gives L(SZ ∩ AC ∩ ES) ≥ c ++ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Clearly, such a result cannot be proved in ZFC, as it is consistent that AC∩SZ = ∅.) It was noticed, in a 2017 paper [13] of Ciesielski, Gámez-Merino, Mazza, and Seoane-Sepúlveda (and repeated in a survey [18]), that the argument from [31] actually works under weaker assumption cov(M) = c. This, however, was not precise, since (as we will see below) the argument requires also the assumption that c is regular, which does not follow from cov(M) = c.…”
Section: Lemma 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, Płotka, assuming CH, proved that the family AC∩SZ is c + -lineable [31]. (Clearly, such a result cannot be proved in ZFC, as it is consistent that AC∩SZ = ∅.)…”
Section: Lemma 23mentioning
confidence: 99%