2011
DOI: 10.1515/integ.2011.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic Proof for the Geometric Structure of Sumsets

Abstract: We consider a finite set of lattice points and their convex hull. The author previously gave a geometric proof that the sumsets of these lattice points take over the central regions of dilated convex hulls, thus revealing an interesting connection between additive number theory and geometry. In this paper, we will see an algebraic proof of this fact when the convex hull of points is a simplex, exploring the connection between additive number theory and geometry further.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Iterated Minkowski sums of a finite positively generating set of Z d are "roughly" equal to the integer points in the dilated convex hull. A proof of this fact appears in [Lee11]. We provide a slightly different short proof based on the well known Shapley-Folkman Lemma (see for instance [Cas75]).…”
Section: The Geometry Of Horoballs In Z Dmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Iterated Minkowski sums of a finite positively generating set of Z d are "roughly" equal to the integer points in the dilated convex hull. A proof of this fact appears in [Lee11]. We provide a slightly different short proof based on the well known Shapley-Folkman Lemma (see for instance [Cas75]).…”
Section: The Geometry Of Horoballs In Z Dmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…, w n+1 ], we get the claim. The last equality follows from the fact that in [23] and [24] it is established that if Z(A − A) has maximal rank, then the leading coefficient of the polynomial p…”
Section: Sumsets and Monomial Projections Of Veronese Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding, Khovanskii's result sheds no light on the polynomial p A (t), excepting the leading coefficient, nor the phase transition of ϕ A (t). In view of these considerations, many contributions have been made to these topics as one can see, for instance, in [4,8,9,13,14,15,24,27,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…what "sufficiently large" means). There have been other proofs of Khovanskii's theorem since, including a geometric proof (which also patches an error in Khovanskii's original paper) by Lee [8] and a purely combinatorial proof by Nathanson and Ruzsa [11,12], but to our knowledge no effective version of Khovanskii's theorem is known for subsets of Z d for any d > 1. In this paper we give a different approach to Khovanskii's theorem that yields more information than previous approaches about the structure of the polynomial and where the phase transition occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%