2011
DOI: 10.1137/100801640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic Multigrid for Linear Systems Obtained by Explicit Element Reduction

Abstract: Abstract. We consider sparse linear systems, where a set of "interior" degrees of freedom have been eliminated in order to reduce the problem size. This elimination is assumed to be local, so the "interior" principal sub-matrix is block-diagonal, and the resulting Schur complement is still sparse. For it to be beneficial, the elimination process should lead to reduced memory requirements, but equally importantly, it should also result in an algebraic problem that can be solved efficiently. In this paper we pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this section, which can be read independently of the rest of the paper, is to present a simple matrix result, whose relevance to our problem will be clear in the next section. The result is a generalization of [7,Lemma 4.2]. Suppose i∪f = {1, 2, .…”
Section: General Meshesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The purpose of this section, which can be read independently of the rest of the paper, is to present a simple matrix result, whose relevance to our problem will be clear in the next section. The result is a generalization of [7,Lemma 4.2]. Suppose i∪f = {1, 2, .…”
Section: General Meshesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this work, we focus on algebraic multigrid (AMG) methods: these methods give essentially black-box highly scalable preconditioners for A h requiring minimal discretization information. AMG convergence for lowest-order H 1 and DG finite element discretizations for elliptic problems has been extensively studied in the literature [14,33,57,70] and has further been extended to definite H(curl) [15,48] and H(div) [30,49] problems. Additionally, several high-performance massively parallel and GPU-accelerated implementations such as the BoomerAMG, AMS and ADS preconditioners in the hypre library [34] are available.…”
Section: Algebraic Multigrid Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, for efficiency, we would like to build a preconditioner directly for the (sparse) matrix S and not for the original matrix A. Such preconditioners are discussed in [10] where it is shown, both theoretically and practically, that BoomerAMG and AMS work well on Schur complements of H 1 and H(curl) discretizations respectively. Similar analysis for the H(div) case was recently performed in [5].…”
Section: Scalable Algebraic H(div) Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, these two approaches are of great practical interest and the goal of the present paper is to study them in a common framework, emphasize their similarities and differences, and most importantly, design new, or modify existing solution techniques that are efficient and scalable, achieving substantial savings compared to the state-of-the-art solvers for the original problems. For problems obtained by static condensation, there has been success in modifying the state-of-the-art solvers (AMS and ADS) to be directly applicable to the reduced problem, cf., [10,5]. In this paper, we focus on the design of scalable solvers for problems involving H(div) in a general algebraic setting, extending the preliminary results in [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%