2016
DOI: 10.1515/tmj-2016-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic Kan extensions along morphisms of internal algebra classifiers

Abstract: An "algebraic left Kan extension" is a left Kan extension which interacts well with the algebraic structure present in the given situation, and these appear in various subjects such as the homotopy theory of operads and in the study of conformal field theories. In the most interesting examples, the functor along which we left Kan extend goes between categories that enjoy universal properties which express the meaning of the calculation we are trying to understand. These universal properties say that the catego… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present contribution exploits the objective method initiated in [21], establishing the Faà di Bruno formula as the homotopy cardinality of an equivalence of groupoids, but takes a further abstraction step, which leads to a more general formula and a much simpler proof. We achieve this by leveraging some recent advances in category theory: on one hand, 2-categorical perspectives on operads and related structures discussed in [51,52,53], and on the other hand, the theory of decomposition spaces [23,24]. With these tools, the proof of the equivalence of groupoids ends up being rather neat, emerging naturally from general principles.…”
Section: Outline Of Results and Proof Ingredientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present contribution exploits the objective method initiated in [21], establishing the Faà di Bruno formula as the homotopy cardinality of an equivalence of groupoids, but takes a further abstraction step, which leads to a more general formula and a much simpler proof. We achieve this by leveraging some recent advances in category theory: on one hand, 2-categorical perspectives on operads and related structures discussed in [51,52,53], and on the other hand, the theory of decomposition spaces [23,24]. With these tools, the proof of the equivalence of groupoids ends up being rather neat, emerging naturally from general principles.…”
Section: Outline Of Results and Proof Ingredientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof Proposition 4.6.5 of states that a strictly cartesian 2‐natural transformation between polynomial 2‐functors (between strict slices of Grpd) is also homotopy cartesian if just the codomain 2‐functor is familial , which essentially means that it preserves fibrations. On the other hand, familiality is implied by the following slight variation of [, Theorem 4.4.5], whose notation we use freely: in the proof given in , the condition that the lowershriek component is a fibration is not needed.…”
Section: Monad Adjunctions and The Relative (Two‐sided) Bar Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows from the general property of classifiers for polynomial monads that this square is a pullback (cf. the proof of Theorem 5.7.2 in [Web16] or proof of Theorem 5.15 from [BB17]).…”
Section: Internal Algebra Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second of these, concerning colax Talgebras, generalises the main result of [Kou15a], which describes creation of algebraic Kan extensions in the case of a double category K. The latter in turn is a generalisation of a result by Getzler, on the lifting of pointwise left Kan extensions along symmetric monoidal enriched functors, that was given in [Get09], where it was used to obtain a coherent way of freely generating many types of generalised operad. In [Web15] a variant of Theorem 7.7, considered in the setting of 2-categories, is used to obtain algebraic Kan extensions along 'morphisms of internal algebra classifiers'. Theorem 7.8 can also be regarded as an extension of Kelly's result on 'doctrinal adjunction', given in [Kel74], as we shall see in the next section.…”
Section: Creativity Of the Forgetful Functors U : T -Alg → Kmentioning
confidence: 99%