2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2017.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic estimation and active disturbance rejection in the control of flat systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…where ψ 0 (x, t) = ψ(x, t) − ψ(x, t) refers to the estimation; ψ(x, t) refers to the uncertainties; ξ (t) is the lumped time-varying disturbance that is completely unknown, representing internal dynamics, model uncertainties, and external disturbances of the system. The same treatment of (8) has been applied and reported in literature such as [27], [36], [37]. Assumption 1: Suppose that the first m time derivative of the lumped disturbance ξ (t) of system (8) exits, and ξ (t) can be represented in the following time-varying form [41]:…”
Section: Controller Design and Stability Analysis A Plant Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ψ 0 (x, t) = ψ(x, t) − ψ(x, t) refers to the estimation; ψ(x, t) refers to the uncertainties; ξ (t) is the lumped time-varying disturbance that is completely unknown, representing internal dynamics, model uncertainties, and external disturbances of the system. The same treatment of (8) has been applied and reported in literature such as [27], [36], [37]. Assumption 1: Suppose that the first m time derivative of the lumped disturbance ξ (t) of system (8) exits, and ξ (t) can be represented in the following time-varying form [41]:…”
Section: Controller Design and Stability Analysis A Plant Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a robust framework for an extensive range of applications, especially estimation problems in control, is presented in [17]. It has been used successfully to identify the parameters of the IM model in [18] and to estimate disturbances in [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a new intelligent proportional–derivative (i-PD) controller for active suspension system with 2 degrees of freedom was proposed by Haddar et al 10 In this study, i-PD was designed similarly to active disturbance rejection control (ADRC). For solving the problem of precise tuning process requirement, 11,12 Haddar et al 13 suggested a modification in classical ADRC structure to ameliorate the dynamic response and prevent the problem of sprung mass uncertainties. Moreover, Wang et al 4 proposed a model free control based on fractional-order sliding mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%