2018
DOI: 10.3390/app8112098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AlGaN Ultraviolet Metal–Semiconductor–Metal Photodetectors with Reduced Graphene Oxide Contacts

Abstract: AlGaN semiconductors are promising materials in the field of ultraviolet (UV) detection. We fabricated AlGaN/GaN UV metal–semiconductor–metal (MSM) photodiodes with two back-to-back interdigitated finger electrodes comprising reduced graphene oxide (rGO). The rGO showed high transparency below the wavelength of 380 nm, which is necessary for a visible-blind photodetector, and showed outstanding Schottky behavior on AlGaN. As the photocurrent, dark current, photoresponsivity, detectivity, and cut-off wavelength… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AlGaN 22,23 . In this regard, the combination of graphene electrodes and AlGaN/GaN heterostructures may yield an excellent UV photodetector, considering the high transparency of graphene in the UV spectral region and the high electrical conductivities of graphene and 2DEG, which would benefit efficient charge collection in the photodetector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AlGaN 22,23 . In this regard, the combination of graphene electrodes and AlGaN/GaN heterostructures may yield an excellent UV photodetector, considering the high transparency of graphene in the UV spectral region and the high electrical conductivities of graphene and 2DEG, which would benefit efficient charge collection in the photodetector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure S7 (Supporting Information), the α of InGaN photodetector and InN/InGaN heterojunction photodetector is 0.038 and 0.042, respectively, which suggests a complex process of photogenerated carriers excitation, recombination, trapping, and diffusion. [40] Moreover, the spectral responsivity (R) of the photodetector was evaluated by the following formula: [41] R I I PS…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the spectral responsivity ( R ) of the photodetector was evaluated by the following formula: [ 41 ] R badbreak=Ilight IdarkPS \[ \begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{R\; = \frac{{{I_{{\rm{light}}}}\; - \;{I_{{\rm{dark}}}}}}{{PS}}\;}\end{array} \] where I light and I dark are the photocurrents and the dark current, respectively; P is the light power density (as shown in Figure S6b, Supporting Information), and S is the irradiated area of a photodetector device (0.1256 mm 2 ). As shown in Figure 3c, the maximum value of R for the InN/InGaN NRA heterojunction photodetector is 9.27 A W −1 at 377 nm, and the maximum value of R for the InGaN photodetector is 0.38 A W −1 (Figure S6c, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It reflects the sensitivity of incident light energy on the surface of the device. R was presented as a function of EQE that could be denoted as [ 11 ] R = J ph P in = EQE λ q h c $$R = \frac{J_{\text{ph}}}{P_{\text{in}}} = \text{EQE} \frac{\lambda q}{h c}$$ where λ is the wavelength of the incident light, q is the elementary charge, and c is the velocity of light in a vacuum. D * of PDs is related to R , and I dark is the dark current, A is the active area, D * can be calculated by the formula [ 12 ] D = A 1 2 R false( 2 q I dark false) 1 2 $$D^{*} = \frac{A^{\frac{1}{2}} R}{\left(\left(\right.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%