2013
DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algal turf scrubber (ATS) floways on the Great Wicomico River, Chesapeake Bay: productivity, algal community structure, substrate and chemistry1

Abstract: Two Algal Turf Scrubber (ATS) units were deployed on the Great Wicomico River (GWR) for 22 months to examine the role of substrate in increasing algal productivity and nutrient removal. The yearly mean productivity of flat ATS screens was 15.4 g · m(-2)  · d(-1) . This was elevated to 39.6 g · m(-2)  · d(-1) with a three-dimensional (3-D) screen, and to 47.7 g · m(-2)  · d(-1) by avoiding high summer harvest temperatures. These methods enhanced nutrient removal (N, P) in algal biomass by 3.5 times. Eighty-six … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This unique performance makes algal-bacterial biofilm based photobioreactors a more attractive platform for advanced nutrient removal from surface water than other commonly used technologies including constructed wetlands and ecological floating beds (Table 4). For instance, Adey et al (2013) reported that the TN and TP of the Great Wicomico River remained at 0.3-0.6 and 0.01-0.03 mg L À1 , respectively, during ATS operation. Similarly, Boelee et al (2011) reported TN and TP of 0.1 and 0.05 mg L À1 , respectively, in the treated effluent of municipal wastewater by microalgal biofilms.…”
Section: Attached Microalgae-bacteria Consortium In Advanced Nutrientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This unique performance makes algal-bacterial biofilm based photobioreactors a more attractive platform for advanced nutrient removal from surface water than other commonly used technologies including constructed wetlands and ecological floating beds (Table 4). For instance, Adey et al (2013) reported that the TN and TP of the Great Wicomico River remained at 0.3-0.6 and 0.01-0.03 mg L À1 , respectively, during ATS operation. Similarly, Boelee et al (2011) reported TN and TP of 0.1 and 0.05 mg L À1 , respectively, in the treated effluent of municipal wastewater by microalgal biofilms.…”
Section: Attached Microalgae-bacteria Consortium In Advanced Nutrientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding of the complex interactions between attached microalgae and bacteria is pointing out how cooperative interactions allow for functionally stable consortium (Borowitzka, 2016;Ramanan et al, 2016). Besides, the increasing implementation of photobioreactors using attached microalgaebacteria consortium, such as Algal Turf Scrubbers (ATS) (Adey et al, 2013), tank photobioreactors (Su et al, 2011) and tubular biofilm photobioreactor (De Godos et al, 2009), are delivering valuable information about nutrient removal at low concentrations. Recent progress in genomic techniques also allows a better identification of functional microorganisms and the genes involved in nutrient removal (Lindemann et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Conventional Technologies Disadvantages Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations