2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AlF3-modified anode-electrolyte interface for effective Na dendrites restriction in NASICON-based solid-state electrolyte

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the total resistance starts to decrease until cycling at 1.0 mA cm −2 (Figure 3f and Figure S11c, Supporting Information) and ultimately shows a high CCD of 1.4 mA cm −2 , which to our best knowledge is the top‐level among reported NASICON‐based SSEs in published literatures up to now (Figure 3g). [ 37–41 ] It also shows excellent long‐term galvanostatic cycling stability at RT. As shown in Figure 3h, the Na/SPAN‐NASICON/Na cell delivers a stable cycling performance for up to 500 h at 0.1 and 0.25 mA cm −2 , further confirming the effective suppression of dendrites growth and highly improved cycling stability among anode–electrolyte interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the total resistance starts to decrease until cycling at 1.0 mA cm −2 (Figure 3f and Figure S11c, Supporting Information) and ultimately shows a high CCD of 1.4 mA cm −2 , which to our best knowledge is the top‐level among reported NASICON‐based SSEs in published literatures up to now (Figure 3g). [ 37–41 ] It also shows excellent long‐term galvanostatic cycling stability at RT. As shown in Figure 3h, the Na/SPAN‐NASICON/Na cell delivers a stable cycling performance for up to 500 h at 0.1 and 0.25 mA cm −2 , further confirming the effective suppression of dendrites growth and highly improved cycling stability among anode–electrolyte interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10a,29 ] The ontological impedance ( R s ) also increases with increasing cycles, which may be due to the loss of salt in electrolyte during the process of repairing SEI layer, leading to the decrease of solute and the increase of solution resistance. [ 30 ] In contrast, R s and R ct of symmetric cell with Na‐O‐CCF electrode become smaller with increasing cycles (Figure 6f). Additional proof, that the charge‐transfer kinetic is much faster in Na‐O‐CCF electrode, can be seen from the exchange current densities ( I 0 ; Figure 6h).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrochemical tests indicated that the resistance of symmetric batteries with interface modified NASICON electrolytes was much lower than that of symmetric batteries with normal NZSICON electrolytes (400 Ω cm 2 vs. 4000 Ω cm 2 ), which could be attributed to the better wetting and attachment across the Na/NASICON interface. Miao et al [64] initially employed AlF 3 as the Na/SSE interface layer in solid-state sodium batteries to hinder the growth of Na dendrites. As demonstrated in Figure 8a, compared with the bare NASICON Na 3 Zr 2 Si 2 PO 12 , the AlF 3 layer could not only efficiently ameliorate the interfacial contact between SSEs and Na metal anodes, but also induced a Na + conducting buffer layer.…”
Section: Anode/sse Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4000 Ω cm 2 ), which could be attributed to the better wetting and attachment across the Na/NASICON interface. Miao et al [64] . initially employed AlF 3 as the Na/SSE interface layer in solid‐state sodium batteries to hinder the growth of Na dendrites.…”
Section: Interface Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%