2019
DOI: 10.2140/apde.2019.12.1613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alexandrov’s theorem revisited

Abstract: We show that among sets of finite perimeter balls are the only volumeconstrained critical points of the perimeter functional.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case M j is the boundary of an open set (and thus, necessarily, Γ = ∅), and M j has almost-constant (non-zero) mean curvature, then the occurrence of bubbling is unavoidable, and its description has been undertaken in various papers, see e.g. [BC84, Str84, CM17, DMMN17, KM17,DM17]. From this point of view, the fact that we can avoid bubbling under somehow generic assumptions on the boundary data Γ is a remarkable rigidity feature of Plateau's problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case M j is the boundary of an open set (and thus, necessarily, Γ = ∅), and M j has almost-constant (non-zero) mean curvature, then the occurrence of bubbling is unavoidable, and its description has been undertaken in various papers, see e.g. [BC84, Str84, CM17, DMMN17, KM17,DM17]. From this point of view, the fact that we can avoid bubbling under somehow generic assumptions on the boundary data Γ is a remarkable rigidity feature of Plateau's problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that, allowing virtual volume-preserving deformations "coalescence" and "break up" does indeed permit to rule out (a'); unlike for (a) and (b), however, it will be the stability assumption, rather than stationarity, that will do so (stationarity alone would not suffice). In fact we will prove the following proposition in Section 5 (the formal notions of "coalescence" and "break-up" deformations are given in Definitions 2, 3, 4 and the notions of stationarity and stability for these deformations are given in Definition 5 below): 10 For further comments on bounds on the full curvature, see Section 6.…”
Section: Non-ambient Deformations (And Major Gain In Regularity)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not immediately clear why the curvature should play a role, since E Ω selects the mean curvature (and not the full curvature) as the key quantity that drives towards an equilibrium. The mean curvature of a tiny neck, obtained by a smoothing of two touching spherical caps, may attain any value, in particular the neck could be part of a Delaunay surface, which is stationary for g ≡ 0 (in stark contrast with (a), where smoothing leads to very high mean curvature) 10 .…”
Section: Non-ambient Deformations (And Major Gain In Regularity)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been a lot of recent research on generalizations and quantifications of the Alexandrov theorem. We refer to [10] for an overview of this challenging problem, and mention the works [14,15,16] on the characterization of critical sets of the isoperimetric problem and [11,12,27] on quantification of the Alexandrov theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%