2019
DOI: 10.1145/3338123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alera

Abstract: The successful deployment of autonomous real-time systems is contingent on their ability to recover from performance degradation of sensors, actuators, and other electro-mechanical subsystems with low latency. In this article, we introduce ALERA, a novel framework for real-time control law adaptation in nonlinear control systems assisted by system state encodings that generate an error signal when the code properties are violated in the presence of failures. The fundamental contributions of this methodology ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be observed in La 0.5 Bi 0.2 Ba 0.2 Mn 0.1 FeO 3 ( 38 ) which has a high CT value but a very low specific surface area value while in data points like LaMg 0.4 Cr 0.6 O 3 ( 22 ), the CT value is lower but the value of the specific surface area is much higher. Another RASPR descriptor Abs diff (| MaxPos‐MaxNeg |) signifies the absolute difference between the MaxPos and MaxNeg values [18, 24]. Since a greater number of compounds in our training set has a higher MaxPos value than the MaxNeg value, the descriptor Abs diff expresses a positive contribution to the response.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be observed in La 0.5 Bi 0.2 Ba 0.2 Mn 0.1 FeO 3 ( 38 ) which has a high CT value but a very low specific surface area value while in data points like LaMg 0.4 Cr 0.6 O 3 ( 22 ), the CT value is lower but the value of the specific surface area is much higher. Another RASPR descriptor Abs diff (| MaxPos‐MaxNeg |) signifies the absolute difference between the MaxPos and MaxNeg values [18, 24]. Since a greater number of compounds in our training set has a higher MaxPos value than the MaxNeg value, the descriptor Abs diff expresses a positive contribution to the response.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Read‐Across‐v4.1 available from https://sites.google.com/jadavpuruniversity.in/dtc-lab-software/home is a java‐based software tool that takes the training and test set files and a few hyperparameters as inputs and quickly computes the Read‐Across‐based predictions based on similarity considerations with the Euclidean Distance‐based approach, the Gaussian Kernel Similarity‐based approach and the Laplacian Kernel Similarity‐based approach. The tool also computes the corresponding validation metrics for predictions along with the compound‐specific similarity and error‐based measures for the confidence of predictions [15, 24]. The pre‐requisite to perform the Read‐Across‐based predictions is to identify the optimized setting of the hyperparameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not a statistical method; instead, it uses the similarity between chemical analogues (source chemicals) to predict the property of unknown or query chemical substances [39]. This method uses either the analogue approach (one source chemical for the prediction) or the category approach (more than one source chemicals for predictions) [40]. The Read‐Across method is the most efficient alternative option for data gap‐filling and toxicity evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RASPR method is a combined method of read‐across and QSPR that encapsulates the advantages of both of these methods and generates enhanced predictivity. In this method, selected structural and physicochemical descriptors from the QSPR model are used to generate different similarity and error‐based measures derived from the similarity‐based read‐across approach, [40] and these measures are merged with the initial structural and physicochemical descriptors to develop RASPR models after further feature selection. The general working process behind the RASPR is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%