2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000263344.53000.a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alemtuzumab (Campath 1H) Induction With Tacrolimus Monotherapy Is Safe for High Immunological Risk Renal Transplantation

Abstract: Immunosuppression for immunologically high-risk renal transplant patients usually involves antithymocyte globulin induction with triple drug maintenance therapy. Alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 antibody, has shown promise in tolerogenic induction protocols, requiring minimal maintenance immunosuppression. In this prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, we enrolled 21 high immunological risk patients (i.e., panel reactive antibody>20% or previous transplant). Patients received either single-do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total CNI avoidance, 3,5,9 -38 CNI minimization, 17,39 -55 and delayed introduction of CNI 49,50,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] were investigated in 32 (n ϭ 5791), 17 (n ϭ 4131), and 10 studies (n ϭ 1519) respectively. Two studies 50,55 investigated CNI delay followed by minimization: to avoid "double counting" these were analyzed as "delay" studies initially, but if subgroup analyses were necessary (due to heterogeneity), then the same study was considered separately in both the "minimization" and "delay" subanalyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total CNI avoidance, 3,5,9 -38 CNI minimization, 17,39 -55 and delayed introduction of CNI 49,50,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] were investigated in 32 (n ϭ 5791), 17 (n ϭ 4131), and 10 studies (n ϭ 1519) respectively. Two studies 50,55 investigated CNI delay followed by minimization: to avoid "double counting" these were analyzed as "delay" studies initially, but if subgroup analyses were necessary (due to heterogeneity), then the same study was considered separately in both the "minimization" and "delay" subanalyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has already been reported in a retrospective study with 14,362 recipients, whose acute rejection incidence at the end of the first year of transplantation was greater in the group of patients receiving alemtuzumab induction as compared with that receiving thymoglobulin (19.2% vs. 10.2%; p< 0.001). 27 Prospective studies have also compared the use of induction therapies with thymoglobulin or alemtuzumab in renal transplant recipients receiving TAC, TAC and MMF, or SRL. 20,21,28 Acute rejection incidences were 18%, 23%, and 28%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allograft survival was equal in both groups at 87%. These results confi rm that steroid avoidance is not an appropriate alternative for high immunological risk patients, refer to table 4 [48]. Augustine et al 2010, andGaber et al 1996, recommended high risk recipients for instance those with delayed graft function or donor reactive cellular immunity to be identifi ed at the time of transplantation for steroid maintenance [49][50][51].…”
Section: Steroid Minimization and High Immunological Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%