2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-021-02005-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ALE formulation for thermomechanical inelastic material models applied to tire forming and curing simulations

Abstract: Forming of tires during production is a challenging process for Lagrangian solid mechanics due to large changes in the geometry and material properties of the rubber layers. This paper extends the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) formulation to thermomechanical inelastic material models with special consideration of rubber. The ALE approach based on tracking the material and spatial meshes is used, and an operator-split is employed which splits up the solution within a time step into a mesh smoothing step, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated that the response of pavements can be obtained efficiently using the Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) methodology [1][2][3]. Typically, ALE formulations are used in adaptive meshing strategies [4][5][6][7] or fluid mechanics [8][9][10]. However, the ALE formulation has been adapted to be capable of simulating the quasi-static response of tire structures [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that the response of pavements can be obtained efficiently using the Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) methodology [1][2][3]. Typically, ALE formulations are used in adaptive meshing strategies [4][5][6][7] or fluid mechanics [8][9][10]. However, the ALE formulation has been adapted to be capable of simulating the quasi-static response of tire structures [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several smoothing methods are available, each with varying complexity and computational costs. Three commonly used methods include [34][35][36][37][38]: (i) elliptic mesh generation smoothing, such as the Laplacian smoothing [35,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45]; (ii) forced-based smoothing, using spring-like methods [34,46]; (iii) smoothing methods based on structural mechanics, such as elastic smoothing [36,37,47] (sometimes with the combination of the FEM Jacobian-based stiffening [48,49]) or hyperelastic smoothing [50][51][52].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%