2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0134(20001115)41:3<407::aid-prot120>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aldose and aldehyde reductases: Correlation of molecular modeling and mass spectrometric studies on the binding of inhibitors to the active site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(47 reference statements)
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Docking with all-trans-and 9-cis-retinal resulted in severe contacts against amino acid side chains from the substrate-binding pocket. Similarly to what has been observed with other substrates and inhibitors [27,31,32], the larger loop C could be the determinant for the absence of activity of pig aldehyde reductase with retinoids. Figure 4A).…”
Section: Docking With Retinoidssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Docking with all-trans-and 9-cis-retinal resulted in severe contacts against amino acid side chains from the substrate-binding pocket. Similarly to what has been observed with other substrates and inhibitors [27,31,32], the larger loop C could be the determinant for the absence of activity of pig aldehyde reductase with retinoids. Figure 4A).…”
Section: Docking With Retinoidssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Recent studies on AR and aldehyde reductase suggest that the C-terminal loop (loop C) is critical for substrate specificity, catalytic efficiency and inhibitor sensitivity [27,31,32]. The most significant structural difference between ARs and aldehyde reductases is the size of loop C, which is nine residues longer in aldehyde reductases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorbinil only binds to the anionic pocket and has been shown to inhibit ALR1 and ALR2 equally. However, other inhibitors that bind to both the “anionic” and “specificity” pockets show specificity for ALR2 [31], [33]. β-glucogallin occupies both the “anionic” and “specificity” pockets resulting in more active site interactions (Figure 4C–D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[α] 25 D −3.4 ( c = 0.22, CH 3 OH); IR (neat) ν max 3410, 1637, 1604, 1532, 1448, 1333 cm −1 ; 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CD 3 OD) δ 6.28 (s, 2H), 4.85 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.79–3.76 (dd, J = 2.0, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.61–3.58 (dd, J = 5.0, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.37–3.20 (m, 6H); 13 C NMR (125.7 MHz, CD 3 OD) δ 175.5, 147.0, 133.2, 127.0, 109.4, 81.2, 79.6, 79.0, 73.9, 71.3, 62.6, 43.5; ESI-HRMS calcd. for C 14 H 15 NO 9 Na [M + Na] + , 368.0952; found, 368.0958.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%