2016
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.363
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aldo-keto reductases are biomarkers of NRF2 activity and are co-ordinately overexpressed in non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract: Background:Although the nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) pathway is one of the most frequently dysregulated in cancer, it is not clear whether mutational status is a good predictor of NRF2 activity. Here we utilise four members of the aldo-keto reductase (AKR) superfamily as biomarkers to address this question.Methods:Twenty-three cell lines of diverse origin and NRF2-pathway mutational status were used to determine the relationship between AKR expression and NRF2 activity. AKR expression was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon exposure to oxidative or electrophilic stress, Nrf2 is released from Keap1, allowing it to evade the ubiquitination process and translocate from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in order to transcriptionally activate ARE-containing genes such as AKRs, HO1, NQO1, GCLC, and GCLM, which encode metabolic and cytoprotective enzymes (19,32,38,41,42) in normal, healthy cells. In contrast to its cytoprotective role in normal cells, accumulating evidence suggests that high, persistent activation of Nrf2, along with its downstream target genes such as AKR1C1, AKR1C3, and HO1, is associated with progression, metastasis, and resistance against chemoand radiotherapy in various types of cancers, including NSCLC, as a poor prognostic factor (21,24,43). The Keap1-Nrf2 pathway is therefore considered to be a new oncogenic signaling pathway and an attractive target for the development of therapeutics to treat cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon exposure to oxidative or electrophilic stress, Nrf2 is released from Keap1, allowing it to evade the ubiquitination process and translocate from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in order to transcriptionally activate ARE-containing genes such as AKRs, HO1, NQO1, GCLC, and GCLM, which encode metabolic and cytoprotective enzymes (19,32,38,41,42) in normal, healthy cells. In contrast to its cytoprotective role in normal cells, accumulating evidence suggests that high, persistent activation of Nrf2, along with its downstream target genes such as AKR1C1, AKR1C3, and HO1, is associated with progression, metastasis, and resistance against chemoand radiotherapy in various types of cancers, including NSCLC, as a poor prognostic factor (21,24,43). The Keap1-Nrf2 pathway is therefore considered to be a new oncogenic signaling pathway and an attractive target for the development of therapeutics to treat cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the KEAP1 mutant gene signature (27 genes) of Goldstein et al [ 38 ] also contains a set of overlapping downregulated genes present in our combinatorial analysis of data from both microarrays: ABCC2, CABYR, CYP4F11, NR0B1, and PGD ( Supplementary Table 5 ). It is noteworthy that a recent publication on a lung cancer biomarker specific to the aldo-keto reductase (AKR) family of proteins states that one of these proteins identified in our NRMGS – AKR1C1 – can be used as a potential biomarker in lung cancer [ 39 ]. It is well known that the classic NRF2-regulated gene GCLC (glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit) is highly expressed in lung cancer and increased GCLC expression is highly correlated with poorer survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table delineating genes in Figure 9 that are associated with the response to oxidative stress ( Duong et al, 2017 ; Jung et al, 2017 ; Lee and Ryu, 2017 ; Peuchant et al, 2006 ; MacLeod et al, 2016 ; Jiang et al, 2016 ; Gorrini et al, 2013 ; Miura et al, 2013 ; Kim et al, 2006 ; Banning et al, 2005 ; Murray et al, 2003 ; Doyle et al, 1999 ).…”
Section: Figure 2–figure Supplementmentioning
confidence: 99%