Velferdstjenestenes Vilkår 2020
DOI: 10.18261/9788215034713-2020-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alderdom i det teknologiske Utopia? Velferdsteknologi i norske kommuner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Awareness of the effects of welfare state politics, and how various processes of decentralised responsibilities combined with increased managerial control are met and handled is not new in a Scandinavian context (Vike et al, 2002). In studies of female-dominated professions like nursing, much attention has been given to how the evolution of modern healthcare systems has caused an increase in informal and invisible work, and a lack of control of the amount and complexity of organisational responsibilities (Allen, 2015;Englund & Solbrekke, 2011;Griffith & Smith, 2018;Haukelien, 2020;Olsvold, 2016;Thagaard, 2016;Thomassen, 2016). Contributing to this line of research, this chapter explores and discusses how nurses relate to digital tools in the temporal structuring of tasks, balancing their mandate as a caregiving profession and their role as the organisational 'glue' in the modern welfare system.…”
Section: The Rhythms Of Care and The Modern Welfare Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Awareness of the effects of welfare state politics, and how various processes of decentralised responsibilities combined with increased managerial control are met and handled is not new in a Scandinavian context (Vike et al, 2002). In studies of female-dominated professions like nursing, much attention has been given to how the evolution of modern healthcare systems has caused an increase in informal and invisible work, and a lack of control of the amount and complexity of organisational responsibilities (Allen, 2015;Englund & Solbrekke, 2011;Griffith & Smith, 2018;Haukelien, 2020;Olsvold, 2016;Thagaard, 2016;Thomassen, 2016). Contributing to this line of research, this chapter explores and discusses how nurses relate to digital tools in the temporal structuring of tasks, balancing their mandate as a caregiving profession and their role as the organisational 'glue' in the modern welfare system.…”
Section: The Rhythms Of Care and The Modern Welfare Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing various types of technologies enabling 'care at a distance' through remote monitoring and control of older adults living at home has emerged as one of the major solutions to the 'problem of aging' in Norway (Haukelien, 2020;Tøndel & Seibt, 2019) and in other comparable welfare states like the United Kingdom (Lynch, 2015;Milligan et al, 2011) and the Netherlands (Neven, 2015;Oudshoorn, 2011).…”
Section: What Is "Technology In Care"?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time spent on reorganising home care services, adjusting the devices and alarm-interruptions, for instance, take the form of invisible work that is not included in the accounts when technology related time-savings and efficiencies are argued for (Haukelien, 2020;Lynch et al, 2019;Tøndel, 2018). Similarly, the work that goes into evaluations of telecare-user's needs, installations, adjustment of devices and alarm responding, are taken as simple, streamlined tasks that follow a standardized protocol, and therefore not adapted to individual needs and capacities (Mort et al, 2013).…”
Section: Questioning the Prevailing Doxamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the implementation of welfare technology is not proceeding as smoothly as expected. Female-dominated work and professional communities, such as the nursing field, are often described as being stuck in habits and traditions and welfare technology is often presented as a modern corrective for these groups (Haukelien, 2020). Nurses are also constructed as an obstacle to the wider use of welfare technology in primary care (Corneliussen & Dyb, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%