2012
DOI: 10.3109/09687637.2011.642906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol survey measures for Europe: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This harm can come from strangers or people known to the drinker and can range from minor nuisances, like being annoyed by litter or noise, to harm as serious as physical or sexual assault. Measuring harm from others is difficult (Johansson et al, 2006) and there is little consensus on the best way to go about this (Bloomfield, Hope, & Kraus, 2012;Connor & Casswell, 2012). There is a need for research comparing various measures of social harm from alcohol (Dawson & Room, 2000); we found no research on subjective measurement of harm from others due to their drinking, likely to the relatively recent rise in interest in this area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This harm can come from strangers or people known to the drinker and can range from minor nuisances, like being annoyed by litter or noise, to harm as serious as physical or sexual assault. Measuring harm from others is difficult (Johansson et al, 2006) and there is little consensus on the best way to go about this (Bloomfield, Hope, & Kraus, 2012;Connor & Casswell, 2012). There is a need for research comparing various measures of social harm from alcohol (Dawson & Room, 2000); we found no research on subjective measurement of harm from others due to their drinking, likely to the relatively recent rise in interest in this area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were significant differences by country and also by types of alcoholic beverages regarding what people think about the quantity of alcohol contained in a drink. And the fact that there was such a limited understanding of the concept of units across all countries calls into question the value of survey research attempting to quantify consumption in this way, and points towards the advantages of using total number of drinks as a preferable, albeit imperfect, measurement mechanism (Bloomfield et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a linguistic perspective, recognition of these sharp contrasts has led to suggestions 376 A. THICKETT ET AL. that terms such as 'drunkenness' are not suitable for cross-national research (Bloomfield et al, 2013). In this context, it is not surprising that assertions have been made to the effect that 'additional empirical research examining the current state of intoxication related vocabulary is clearly needed' (Levitt et al, 2009, p. 449).…”
Section: The Social Role Of Alcohol: Terms Expressions and Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess consumption with low recall bias (because bias increases with the length of recall period; Gmel & Daeppen, 2007) and to gather data on acute (current) consumption levels, a standard weekly drinking measure was used (Bloomfield, Hope, & Kraus, 2012). Participants were asked, "Thinking back over this last week, how many drinks did you have on each day?"…”
Section: Procedures and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%