2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00018-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol-related motivational tendencies in hazardous drinkers: assessing implicit response tendencies using the modified-IAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

24
219
4
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
24
219
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Light drinkers, on the other hand, did not show such an effect. Similar findings were reported by several other researchers (e.g., Palfai and Ostafin, 2003;Ostafin and Palfai, 2006;Wiers et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Light drinkers, on the other hand, did not show such an effect. Similar findings were reported by several other researchers (e.g., Palfai and Ostafin, 2003;Ostafin and Palfai, 2006;Wiers et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Second, whereas explicit measures of alcohol problems failed to predict relapse, logistic regression analyses revealed a clear relationship between relapse and R-SRC performance: Relapse rates increased rather than decreased as alcohol patients were faster to avoid alcohol-related pictures compared to alcohol-unrelated pictures. Both observations are at odds with prior work showing that alcohol-related stimuli elicit approach tendencies rather than avoid tendencies (e.g., Palfai and Ostafin, 2003;Ostafin and Palfai, 2006;Wiers et al, 2009Wiers et al, , 2010. They are also at odds with the more general assumption that addiction is mediated or maintained by automatic approach tendencies towards alcohol (e.g., Deutsch and Strack, 2006;Robinson and Berridge, 1993;Stacy and Wiers, 2010;Tiffany, 1990;Wiers and Stacy, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In studies that use positive and negative as two concepts (as above), the IAT effect is assumed to capture an implicit attitude, which has been characterized as the automatic associations people have between an object and evaluation (good or bad) (Rudman, 2004). The IAT has been used to investigate associative memory in psychopathology (Gemar et al, 2001;Teachman et al, 2001;Teachman and Woody, 2003), including the addictions (e.g., Palfai and Ostafin, 2003;Wiers et al, 2002;Jajodia and Earleywine, 2003). There is substantial evidence for the reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the IAT (Cunningham et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study found that exposure to alcohol advertising led to increases in positive implicit alcohol‐related attitudes, yet only in heavier drinkers (Brown et al ., 2016). Implicit biases in the way drinkers associate alcohol with approach versus avoidance and attend to alcohol cues are associated with consumption (Cox, Fadardi, & Pothos, 2006; Palfai & Ostafin, 2003). Whether alcohol‐advertising exposure influences these cognitive biases remains unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%