Abstract:A review of the scientific literature on the relationship between alcohol and violence and that between drugs and violence is presented. A review and analysis of three major theoretical approaches to understanding these relationships are also presented. A number of conclusions are reached on the basis of these efforts. First, despite a number of published statements to the contrary, we find no significant evidence suggesting that drug use is associated with violence. Second, there is substantial evidence to su… Show more
“…First, drug users do commit a high percentage of crime, and the frequency of their criminal activity, particularly property offenses, tends to be directly related to their level of drug use. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Second, drug treatment provided to offenders has at least moderate effects in reducing drug use and criminal activity and in improving other areas of social functioning. [12][13][14][15][16] Finally, coerced clients and those who may not recognize or acknowledge that they have a drug problem can, through treatment participation and interaction with other clients, become engaged in treatment and do as well as voluntary clients.…”
The effects of perceived coercion and motivation on treatment completion and subsequent rearrest were examined in a sample of substance-abusing offenders assessed for California's Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (SACPA) program. Perceived coercion was measured with the McArthur Perceived Coercion Scale; motivation was measured with the subscales of the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). At treatment entry, clients were more likely to believe that they had exercised their choice in entering treatment than that they had been coerced into treatment. SACPA clients scored relatively low on Recognition and Ambivalence regarding their drug use but relatively high on Taking Steps to address their drug problem. Correlations between perceived coercion and motivation measures at treatment entry indicated that these are separate constructs. In logistic regression models, the Recognition subscale of the SOCRATES significantly predicted "any re-arrest," and Ambivalence and Taking Steps predicted "any drug arrest."
“…First, drug users do commit a high percentage of crime, and the frequency of their criminal activity, particularly property offenses, tends to be directly related to their level of drug use. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Second, drug treatment provided to offenders has at least moderate effects in reducing drug use and criminal activity and in improving other areas of social functioning. [12][13][14][15][16] Finally, coerced clients and those who may not recognize or acknowledge that they have a drug problem can, through treatment participation and interaction with other clients, become engaged in treatment and do as well as voluntary clients.…”
The effects of perceived coercion and motivation on treatment completion and subsequent rearrest were examined in a sample of substance-abusing offenders assessed for California's Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (SACPA) program. Perceived coercion was measured with the McArthur Perceived Coercion Scale; motivation was measured with the subscales of the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). At treatment entry, clients were more likely to believe that they had exercised their choice in entering treatment than that they had been coerced into treatment. SACPA clients scored relatively low on Recognition and Ambivalence regarding their drug use but relatively high on Taking Steps to address their drug problem. Correlations between perceived coercion and motivation measures at treatment entry indicated that these are separate constructs. In logistic regression models, the Recognition subscale of the SOCRATES significantly predicted "any re-arrest," and Ambivalence and Taking Steps predicted "any drug arrest."
“…These studies have found that acute intoxication by alcohol (below sedating levels) is related to aggression when an individual is provoked (Bushman, 1997;Lipsey et al 1997). This increased aggression under conditions of alcohol intoxication in the laboratory is best explained by the fact that alcohol causes changes within a person that increase the risk for aggression, such as reduced intellectual functioning, reduced self-awareness, selective disinhibition, and the inaccurate assessment of risks (Chermack and Giancola 1997;Ito, Miller, and Pollock 1996;Parker and Auerhahn 1998). These same alcohol-induced changes may put a person at risk for nonaggressive crimes, although less research and theorizing have been applied to psychopharmacological explanations for property crime (Goldstein 1985;White and Gorman 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychopharmacological effects of alcohol that have been postulated to increase the risks for delinquency include impairment in communication, which involves provoking others and being easily angered; increased risk taking; an unawareness of the consequences of one's own behavior; and expectancies that alcohol use causes aggression (Bushman 1997;Chermack and Giancola 1996;Ito et al 1996;Parker and Auerhahn 1998;White 1997aWhite , 1997b). An alternative explanation may be that the use of drugs is a social activity, and thus, while using drugs, adolescents may be in the company of peers who encourage or reinforce illegal behavior (Fagan 1993;White 1990).…”
This study examined the proximal effects of alcohol and drug use on adolescent illegal activity. Four years of longitudinal data from the Pittsburgh Youth Study were analyzed for 506 local male adolescents. Participants reported committing offenses against persons more often than general theft under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Aggressive acts were more often related to self-reported acute alcohol use than to marijuana use. Those who reported committing illegal acts under the influence reported committing offenses with other people and being arrested more often than those who did not. Offenses under the influence were more prevalent among heavier alcohol and drug users, more serious offenders, more impulsive youth, and youth with more deviant peers. There were no significant interaction effects of alcohol and drug use with impulsivity or deviant peers in predicting whether illegal acts were committed under the influence. The association between drug use and illegal activity during adolescence is complex.
“…A number of researchers have examined the correlation between alcohol abuse and intimate partner violence, as well as the relationship between alcohol-induced aggression and violent behavior in general (Parker and Auerhahn 1998). Research has clearly shown a statistically significant relationship between alcohol abuse and violence between partners (Miller et al 1989;O'Farrell et al 1999;Testa et al 2003;Thompson and Kingree 2006).…”
Section: Alcohol Abuse and Intimate Partner Violencementioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.