Hair Analysis in Clinical and Forensic Toxicology 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-801700-5.00004-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol Biomarkers in Hair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Previous SoHT consensus documents 17 are regularly updated and, in the most recent issue, the SoHT also recommends to "powder hair prior to the extraction of EtG". These cut-off values were originally determined on the basis of several prevalence and observational studies, meta-analyses, and prudential considerations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Previous SoHT consensus documents 17 are regularly updated and, in the most recent issue, the SoHT also recommends to "powder hair prior to the extraction of EtG". These cut-off values were originally determined on the basis of several prevalence and observational studies, meta-analyses, and prudential considerations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the entire procedure for FAEE analysis, the use of plastic (as recipients, vials or gloves) was avoided due to the potential interference of such materials in the analysis (Pragst, 2015). The mixture was allowed to cool at room temperature, and 20 μL of IS was added.…”
Section: Hair Processing and Extraction Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EtG, ethyl glucuronide abstinence, but does not necessarily prove strict abstinence (Kintz, 2015). One important fact to be noted is that the analysed samples were obtained from subjects that did not report the use of any aggressive cosmetic treatments that could affect alcohol biomarker concentration (bleaching, dyeing, use of alcohol containing products) (Albermann, Musshoff, & Madea, 2011;Crunelle et al, 2015;Kintz, 2015;Pragst, 2015;Suesse et al, 2012). Some discrepancies were however observed, namely in samples 12, 14 and 15.…”
Section: Analysis Of Authentic Hair Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations