1992
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1992.53.487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol availability and consumption: Iowa sales data revisited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the few case studies of spirits privatization in the United States (Iowa) occurred at the retail level with the state retaining control over the wholesale tier. This change was associated with a 10% increase in spirits consumption and a 5% increase in overall alcohol consumption (Holder & Wagenaar, 1990;Mulford et al, 1992). Although we did not find that concerns regarding youth alcohol abuse were related to I-1183 policy opinions, results of a recent U.S. study showed that states with retail monopolies had significantly fewer youth who reported drinking and heavy episodic ("binge") drinking during a past-30-day period, as well as fewer alcohol-impaired drinking deaths (9.3% lower) than those in nonmonopoly states (Miller et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the few case studies of spirits privatization in the United States (Iowa) occurred at the retail level with the state retaining control over the wholesale tier. This change was associated with a 10% increase in spirits consumption and a 5% increase in overall alcohol consumption (Holder & Wagenaar, 1990;Mulford et al, 1992). Although we did not find that concerns regarding youth alcohol abuse were related to I-1183 policy opinions, results of a recent U.S. study showed that states with retail monopolies had significantly fewer youth who reported drinking and heavy episodic ("binge") drinking during a past-30-day period, as well as fewer alcohol-impaired drinking deaths (9.3% lower) than those in nonmonopoly states (Miller et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifi cally, the introduction of large numbers of stores resulting from partial privatization was associated with increases in alcohol consumption (Stockwell et al, 2009), alcohol-related mortality (Stockwell et al, 2011), and lower alcohol prices (Treno et al, 2013). On the other hand, there have been contrary fi ndings (Mulford et al, 1992;Trolldal, 2005aTrolldal, , 2005b. Thus, the data do seem to indicate that monopoly controls are typically associated with more positive public health outcomes.…”
Section: Privatization Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the liberalization of control systems and the transfer of distribution of alcohol sales into private hands, a series of "natural experiments" took place in which relationships between naturally occurring policy changes and public health outcomes could be evaluated. For example, Wagenaar and Holder's (1991) study of the privatization of wine sales in Iowa using time series techniques sparked considerable controversy in JSA with those whose analyses produced different results (Mulford, 1992). Using similar techniques, a series of studies (Holder and Wagenaar, 1990;Wagenaar andHolder, 1991, 1995) subsequently found privatization steps associated with similar effects in fi ve different states.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…American alcohol consumption levels might still be trending upward if the alcoholism concept had not generated research informing Americans of the negative health consequences of excessive drinking. This information, together with Americans' growing concern for health and physical fitness in recent decades, may help to explain the otherwise mysterious consumption uptrend reversal in 1982, even as legal restraints on alcohol availability were still being relaxed (Mulford et al, 1992).…”
Section: What Might Have Beenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the rationale for this prevention approach is r reminiscent of the defunct prohibition movement, so also are its proponent's myth-making tactics. Like their prohibitionist predecessors, they claim scientific legitimacy for their approach in the face of highly inconsistent research evidence (Heath, 1986(Heath, , 1990, including compelling evidence that alcohol availability and consumption are not necessarily or mechancially linked (Mulford, Ledolter & Fitzgerald, 1992;. They exaggerate the grovsrth of alcohol abuser numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%