1993
DOI: 10.1080/09595239300185621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol and drug treatments in Australian correctional services

Abstract: A comprehensive literature review on the subject of drug and alcohol treatments in correctional services reveals the size of the drug and alcohol problem within the prison population and reconfirms the positive correlation between drugs, alcohol and criminal activity. Disturbingly few comprehensive ongoing assessment and treatment services are available for the prison population. Special drug and alcohol-related issues such as HIV and hepatitis B infection, and high drug-related post-release prisoner mortality… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SIR--The article by Bruce Westmore and Garry Walter, "Alcohol and drug treatments in Australian correctional services" [1] published in a recent issue of the Drug and Alcohol Review gives a misleading picture of the availability of D&A Services to inmates in Australia. While I realize the authors presented a literature review rather than an analysis of drug and alcohol treatment services for inmates, there were nevertheless significant omissions to their review which would have provided a more complete picture of services available to inmates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIR--The article by Bruce Westmore and Garry Walter, "Alcohol and drug treatments in Australian correctional services" [1] published in a recent issue of the Drug and Alcohol Review gives a misleading picture of the availability of D&A Services to inmates in Australia. While I realize the authors presented a literature review rather than an analysis of drug and alcohol treatment services for inmates, there were nevertheless significant omissions to their review which would have provided a more complete picture of services available to inmates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%