Albuminuria Is Affected by Urinary Tract Infection: A Comparison between Biochemical Quantitative Method and Automatic Urine Chemistry Analyzer UC-3500

Abstract

The automated urine reagent strip test is a cost-effective tool for detecting albuminuria in patients. However, prior research has not investigated how urinary tract infections (UTIs) affect the test’s accuracy. Therefore, this study aims to assess the impact of UTIs on albuminuria diagnosis using both the biochemical quantitative method and the test strip method of the Fully Automatic Urine Chemistry Analyzer, UC-3500 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). From March to December 2019, we prospectively collected midstream urine from adult female UTI patients before and after one week of cephalexin treatment. The urine samples were subjected to culture, routine urinalysis, and albuminuria diagnosis using the biochemical quantitative method and UC-3500. Albuminuria was defined as a urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥ 30 mg/g in the biochemical quantitative method. The results were compared between the two methods. Among fifty-four female patients (average age: 50.5 ± 4.4 years) with UTIs, 24 (44.44%) had transient albuminuria. The quantitative UACR significantly decreased after one week of antibiotic treatment (median: 53 mg/g to 9 mg/g; median difference: −0.54, p < 0.0001). UC-3500 exhibited a higher false positive rate for diagnosing albuminuria during UTIs (42%) compared to after treatment (19%). Its agreement with the biochemical quantitative method was moderate during UTI (κ = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24–0.73) and good after treatment (κ = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45–0.86). UC-3500’s accuracy in diagnosing albuminuria is influenced by UTIs, leading to either transient albuminuria or a false positive reaction of the test strip. UTI should be excluded or treated before its application in albuminuria screening.