2011
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3088.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Albula gilberti, a new species of bonefish (Albuliformes: Albulidae) from the eastern Pacific, and a description of adults of the parapatric A. esuncula

Abstract: A new species of bonefish (Albuliformes: Albulidae: Albulinae) from the eastern Pacific Ocean, Albula gilberti, is described. Previously referred to as Albula sp. A, A. gilberti is distributed throughout the Gulf of California, Mexico to the coastal waters of California, USA. Presently, it can be distinguished from its closest relative, A. esuncula (= Albula sp. C) from the tropical eastern Pacific, solely by differences in mitochondrial DNA (cytochrome b) gene sequences. No diagnostic external morphological c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular characters, alone or supplemented with other evidence such as ecological or life history data, have been used in the past for describing new species of different organisms that are morphologically extremely similar and the taxonomic distinctiveness of which is not easily diagnosed morphologically (e.g., Brower 2010). Most of these works have also assessed morphological variation, thus providing a link to the existing diagnostic reference system based on morphology (Burns et al 2008;Halt et al 2009;Pfeiler et al 2011). Renner (2016) discussed the use of DNA characters in the formal naming of species based on previous works that used DNA marker information for species diagnosis (of which the majority provided a link to morphological traits in the descriptions).…”
Section: Standardizing New Species' Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular characters, alone or supplemented with other evidence such as ecological or life history data, have been used in the past for describing new species of different organisms that are morphologically extremely similar and the taxonomic distinctiveness of which is not easily diagnosed morphologically (e.g., Brower 2010). Most of these works have also assessed morphological variation, thus providing a link to the existing diagnostic reference system based on morphology (Burns et al 2008;Halt et al 2009;Pfeiler et al 2011). Renner (2016) discussed the use of DNA characters in the formal naming of species based on previous works that used DNA marker information for species diagnosis (of which the majority provided a link to morphological traits in the descriptions).…”
Section: Standardizing New Species' Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of Albula are found throughout the world's shallow tropical seas, whereas Pterothrissus inhabit waters of the continental slope up to 1000 m in depth in subtropical and temperate regions of the Eastern Atlantic and North-west Pacific (Table 1). vulpes (Albulidae) (Colborn et al 2001;Adams et al 2008;Bowen et al 2008 Pfeiler et al 2011). Until recently, the genus Albula contained two species, the circumglobal Albula vulpes (Albulidae) and the western Atlantic and eastern Pacific Albula nemoptera (Albulidae).…”
Section: Albuliformes: Albulidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, the genus Albula contained two species, the circumglobal Albula vulpes (Albulidae) and the western Atlantic and eastern Pacific Albula nemoptera (Albulidae). Recent morphometric and population genetic research indicates that there are at least 12 morphologically indistinguishable, but genetically distinct species (Colborn et al 2001;Hidaka et al 2008;Wallace and Tringali 2010;Kwun and Kim 2011;Pfeiler et al 2011). In the Caribbean and western North Atlantic, there are two described species of Albula, A. vulpes and A. nemoptera, and we include here recent genetic work that documents two additional cryptic and presently unnamed species: Albula species B (Albulidae) and Albula sp.…”
Section: Albuliformes: Albulidaementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because Albula morphology has been conserved across species, taxonomic identification remains difficult so the Albula genus is currently in a state of revision. However, recent work by Wallace (2015) and others (Colborn et al 2001;Hidaka et al 2008;Wallace and Tringali 2010;Kwun and Kim 2011;Pfeiler et al 2011) has made significant inroads into the taxonomic status of this complex genus.…”
Section: Systematics and Natural Historymentioning
confidence: 99%