2022
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Albedo variegation on Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko

Abstract: We here study the level of albedo variegation on the nucleus of Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. This is done by fitting the parameters of a standard photometric phase function model to disk–average radiance factor data in images acquired by the Rosetta/OSIRIS Narrow Angle Camera in the orange filter. Local discrepancies between the observed radiance factor and the disk–average solution are interpreted as a proxy $\mathcal {W}$ of the local single–scattering albedo. We find a wide range $0.02 \lesssim \mathcal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further analysis is needed to demonstrate whether the CO 2 -driven ejection of a ≥ 5 m thick layer indeed is possible, i. e., if sufficient CO 2 pressure can be reached at such depths to overcome the tensile strength of the overlying icedust mixture. Whereas Bouquety et al (2022) see subsidence as the major pit-forming mechanism, we here see the collapse as a smaller prelude, that does not lead to detectable morphological changes (put perhaps leads to darkening, as previously mentioned; Davidsson et al 2022a). In the currently proposed scenario, morphological changes come after compaction and darkening, and are due to ejection of material, not subsidence.…”
Section: Contextual Simulationssupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further analysis is needed to demonstrate whether the CO 2 -driven ejection of a ≥ 5 m thick layer indeed is possible, i. e., if sufficient CO 2 pressure can be reached at such depths to overcome the tensile strength of the overlying icedust mixture. Whereas Bouquety et al (2022) see subsidence as the major pit-forming mechanism, we here see the collapse as a smaller prelude, that does not lead to detectable morphological changes (put perhaps leads to darkening, as previously mentioned; Davidsson et al 2022a). In the currently proposed scenario, morphological changes come after compaction and darkening, and are due to ejection of material, not subsidence.…”
Section: Contextual Simulationssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The compaction we propose to have taken place in late October or early November has not been observed in the form of a measurable subsidence. However, Davidsson et al (2022a) demonstrate that the single-scattering albedo at Hapi D was reduced between 2014 August 30 and December 10. They suggest that this darkening (presumably caused by a decrease of porosity and an increased coherent effect, as small brighter grains started acting as larger and darker optically effective particles) is a manifestation of the compaction that actually was observable by OSIRIS.…”
Section: Contextual Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 78%