Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/s18-1158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ALB at SemEval-2018 Task 10: A System for Capturing Discriminative Attributes

Abstract: Semantic difference detection attempts to capture whether a word is a discriminative attribute between two other words. For example, the discriminative feature red characterizes the first word from the (apple, banana) pair, but not the second. Modeling semantic difference is essential for language understanding systems, as it provides useful information for identifying particular aspects of word senses. This paper describes our system implementation (the ALB system of the NLP@Unibuc team) for the 10th task of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(No expl.) 0.63 (Dumitru et al, 2018) SVM for all categories. Excluding the relative category (in which all models perform poorly), there is little variance in the overlap between the pairwise models (where the intersection between DBM and VFM is the largest for each category).…”
Section: Proposed Model (Edam)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(No expl.) 0.63 (Dumitru et al, 2018) SVM for all categories. Excluding the relative category (in which all models perform poorly), there is little variance in the overlap between the pairwise models (where the intersection between DBM and VFM is the largest for each category).…”
Section: Proposed Model (Edam)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to interpretability and explainability we can classify IDA approaches into three categories. Frequency-based models over textbased features, heavily relying on textual features and frequency-based methods (Gamallo, 2018;González et al, 2018) ; ML over Textual features (Dumitru et al, 2018;Sommerauer et al, 2018;King et al, 2018;Mao et al, 2018) and ML over dense vectors and textual features (Brychcín et al, 2018;Attia et al, 2018;Dumitru et al, 2018;Arroyo-Fernández et al, 2018;Speer and Lowry-Duda, 2018;Santus et al, 2018;Grishin, 2018;Zhou et al, 2018;Vinayan et al, 2018;Kulmizev et al, 2018;Zhang and Carpuat, 2018;Shiue et al, 2018). While the first category concentrates on models with higher interpretability, none of these models provide explanations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the word "buckle" is a discriminative feature in the triplet ("seat belt", "tires", "buckle") that characterizes the first concept but not the second. Researchers have formulated this property as a binary classification task and proposed machine learning and similarity-based methods to evaluate the word embeddings (Zhang and Carpuat, 2018;Dumitru et al, 2018;Grishin, 2018). However, to perform these evaluations for a domain-specific small corpus, we would need a manually curated set of discriminative (positive) and non-discriminative (negative) triples, which can be costly and timeconsuming to curate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%