All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book.Alle rechten voorbehouden. Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand, of openbaar gemaakt, in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, door fotokopieën, opnamen of enige andere manier, zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de uitgever. Preface ROEL VAN
GOOR ERNST MULDERThis book contains the texts that were discussed during a conference with the same title. The contributions to the conference were written, edited, and published in advance, and served as a starting point for deliberation. At first sight this book appears to be a standard volume published on the occasion of a meeting of scholars, gathered round a theme of scientific interest. A closer look at the chapters reveals that the authors are all philosophers of education, and that every two articles make a couple. Every pair consists of a statement of a sometimes elaborate argument, concerning the central theme of the book, accompanied by a shorter, but nevertheless thorough, critical response. Furthermore, one scholar seems to be referred to more than any other one, and she also turns out be the author of the last piece in the book. That is no coincidence: Frieda Heyting, or rather her retirement as a professor in the philosophy of education, is the immediate cause of the conference and of the book. But make no mistake: this is not a liber amicorum in the usual sense of the word. This book is no attempt to laurel the professor emeritus-to-be, it contains no overview of all her contributions to the field of the philosophy of education, and also no list of her publications as a scholar. As far as her work is mentioned, it is usually in the context of the other authors disagreeing with her. They are friendly, but very critical in dealing with her scientific achievements. Which is, incidentally, very much in line with her own position as a 'doubting' sceptic. 1 The main characteristic of the conference, and of the book, is a critical consideration of arguments, as should always be the case in the philosophy of education, as well as in any other academic area.The title of this book, 'Grey wisdom? Philosophical reflections on conformity and opposition between generations', deserves some elucidation.1 See her own contribution in this collection: 'The contingency of scholarly development across generations'.
8Generation' is a muddy concept 2 , so why would anybody like to use it as a banner for a conference? First, muddy concepts demand clarification, and this is one of the responsibilities of a philosophical approach. And 'generation' may be a slippery concept, but it is also most definitely educational. Then t...