Abstract:While several drivers of wildlife alarm calls have been identified, recent work on the impact of the audience in the plasticity of alarm calling indicates that intraspecific communication can drive the behavior. We build on this literature by assessing changes in call characteristics in black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) in the presence of recently emerged juveniles. Alarm calls were elicited by approaching individuals, and then recorded using a shotgun microphone. Presence and distance of pups w… Show more
“…This is a valid comparison because human non-verbal vocalizations, such as crying, laughing, grunting, groaning, moaning, or shrieking, do not have lexical content, are generated by subcortical limbic mechanisms, and are evolutionary counterparts of other mammalian vocalizations (for classification of human verbal and non-verbal vocalizations as well as pathological vocalizations, see [ 10 ]). Although animal vocalizations have many subtypes and may convey referential information or be situation-specific (e.g., in species of prairie dogs [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]), they do not represent language in a human sense and do not have grammatical structure, sentences, words, syllables, or even fully translatable meaning. Naming mammalian vocalizations as syllables, particularly those emitted in series, is a misnomer and mistake that is still repeated in the literature.…”
This review summarizes all reported and suspected functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in infant and adult rats. The review leads to the conclusion that all types of ultrasonic vocalizations subserving all functions are vocal expressions of emotional arousal initiated by the activity of the reticular core of the brainstem. The emotional arousal is dichotomic in nature and is initiated by two opposite-in-function ascending reticular systems that are separate from the cognitive reticular activating system. The mesolimbic cholinergic system initiates the aversive state of anxiety with concomitant emission of 22 kHz calls, while the mesolimbic dopaminergic system initiates the appetitive state of hedonia with concomitant emission of 50 kHz vocalizations. These two mutually exclusive arousal systems prepare the animal for two different behavioral outcomes. The transition from broadband infant isolation calls to the well-structured adult types of vocalizations is explained, and the social importance of adult rat vocal communication is emphasized. The association of 22 kHz and 50 kHz vocalizations with aversive and appetitive states, respectively, was utilized in numerous quantitatively measured preclinical models of physiological, psychological, neurological, neuropsychiatric, and neurodevelopmental investigations. The present review should help in understanding and the interpretation of these models in biomedical research.
“…This is a valid comparison because human non-verbal vocalizations, such as crying, laughing, grunting, groaning, moaning, or shrieking, do not have lexical content, are generated by subcortical limbic mechanisms, and are evolutionary counterparts of other mammalian vocalizations (for classification of human verbal and non-verbal vocalizations as well as pathological vocalizations, see [ 10 ]). Although animal vocalizations have many subtypes and may convey referential information or be situation-specific (e.g., in species of prairie dogs [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]), they do not represent language in a human sense and do not have grammatical structure, sentences, words, syllables, or even fully translatable meaning. Naming mammalian vocalizations as syllables, particularly those emitted in series, is a misnomer and mistake that is still repeated in the literature.…”
This review summarizes all reported and suspected functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in infant and adult rats. The review leads to the conclusion that all types of ultrasonic vocalizations subserving all functions are vocal expressions of emotional arousal initiated by the activity of the reticular core of the brainstem. The emotional arousal is dichotomic in nature and is initiated by two opposite-in-function ascending reticular systems that are separate from the cognitive reticular activating system. The mesolimbic cholinergic system initiates the aversive state of anxiety with concomitant emission of 22 kHz calls, while the mesolimbic dopaminergic system initiates the appetitive state of hedonia with concomitant emission of 50 kHz vocalizations. These two mutually exclusive arousal systems prepare the animal for two different behavioral outcomes. The transition from broadband infant isolation calls to the well-structured adult types of vocalizations is explained, and the social importance of adult rat vocal communication is emphasized. The association of 22 kHz and 50 kHz vocalizations with aversive and appetitive states, respectively, was utilized in numerous quantitatively measured preclinical models of physiological, psychological, neurological, neuropsychiatric, and neurodevelopmental investigations. The present review should help in understanding and the interpretation of these models in biomedical research.
“…This is especially pertinent given that the function of the alarm call is to both warn conspecifics of approaching danger and to communicate to the predator that they have been detected (Isbell and Bidner 2016). Additional experiments conducted by our research group demonstrated that prairie dogs adjusted their alarm calls -reducing the central concentration of energy -when calling in the presence of vulnerable pups (Wilson-Henjum et al 2019). Adjustment in prairie dog communication, therefore, appears to be structured by social context mediated by spatial proximity to an approaching threat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This provides evidence that the seemingly costly behaviour of an individual alerting a predator to their presence may have indirect fitness benefits (Shelley and Blumstein 2005). Moreover, we recently demonstrated that the presence of young influenced the alarm call characteristics of adult prairie dogswhereby they lowered the central concentration of energy in their calls (Wilson-Henjum et al 2019). The social context and function of alarm call production provides an interesting avenue for exploring the effects of exposure to anthropogenic noise on animal vocalisation, particularly when contrasted with findings from the significant body of work focussing on advertisement calls and songs (reviewed by Shannon, McKenna, et al 2016).…”
Increasing anthropogenic noise is having a global impact on wildlife, particularly due to the masking of crucial acoustical communication. However, there have been few studies examining the impacts of noise exposure on communication in free-ranging terrestrial mammals. We studied alarm calls of black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) across an urban gradient to explore vocal adjustment relative to different levels of noise exposure. There was no change in the frequency 5%, peak frequency, or duration of the alarm calls across the noise gradient. However, the minimum frequency—a commonly used, yet potentially compromised metric—did indeed show a positive relationship with noise exposure. We suspect this is a result of masking of observable call properties by noise, rather than behavioral adjustment. In addition, the proximity of conspecifics and the distance to the perceived threat (observer) did affect the frequency 5% of alarm calls. These results reveal that prairie dogs do not appear to be adjusting their alarm calls in noisy environments but likely do in relation to their social context and the proximity of a predatory threat. Anthropogenic noise can elicit a range of behavioral and physiological responses across taxa, but elucidating the specific mechanisms driving these responses can be challenging, particularly as these are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Our research sheds light on how prairie dogs appear to respond to noise as a source of increased risk, rather than as a distraction or through acoustical masking as shown in other commonly studied species (e.g., fish, songbirds, marine mammals).
“…The development of this messaging system becomes intricate with human language. Whether the degree of development of the young at birth (which could relate to cognitive development; Scheiber et al 2017;Wilson-Henjum et al 2019) influences the complexity of vocalizations and other displays are yet to be determined.…”
Section: The Origins Of Substrate-borne Vibrational and Acoustic Comm...mentioning
An introduction to acoustic and vibrational communication in animals is presented in this chapter. Starting with the origins of communication and ritualization of vocal and vibrational signals to produce a clear message or broadcast. A summary of communication concepts is presented describing behaviors such as displays. The chapter continues by unraveling some of the complexities of acoustic and vibrational communication such as elephant vibration detection posture and reception of long-range vibrational signal production—or drumming—in Prairie chickens and Kangaroo rats. We discuss the advantages of vibrational and acoustic signal production signals as well as the disadvantages including the influence of environmental factors that may mask or attenuate signals such as wind, water, or structural clutter. Research on the informational content of these signals is progressing. We provide a summary of ground-breaking earlier work, an indication of where we believe the field is now, and a glimpse of where we believe the field could be going in the future. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the characteristics of human language and whether nonhuman animals have such a language with the accompanying mental abilities. It could just be that other animals are most entertained (and threatened!) by our signaling behaviors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.