Akzelerometrie zur Erfassung körperlicher Aktivität

Gabrys, Lars; Thiel, Christian; Tallner, Alexander; Wilms, Britta; Müller, Carsten; Kahlert, Daniela; Jekauc, Darko; Frick, Fabienne; Schulz, Holger; Sprengeler, Ole; Hey, Stefan; Kobel, Susanne; Vogt, Lutz

doi:10.1007/s12662-014-0349-5

Cited by 36 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…PA of 1 week is objectively assessed with the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT. The triaxial accelerometer records intensity and duration of accelerations and converts the signals to “activity counts” [55]. Participants receive the device by post at the beginning of the pre-, post-, and follow-up assessment period.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coaching and Prompting for Remote Physical Activity Promotion: Study Protocol of a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial (Movingcall)

Fischer

Donath

Zwygart

et al. 2019

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Physical inactivity is currently seen as one of the biggest global public health issue. Remote physical activity (PA) promotion programs are expected to be effective if they are individually tailored and include behavior change techniques, personal coaching, and regular prompting. However, it is still not fully understood which intervention components are most effective. This paper describes the rationale and design of a study on an individually tailored remote PA promotion program comparing the efficacy of coaching and prompting with a single written advice. Methods. In total, 288 adults (age 20 to 65 years) were randomly assigned to three different intervention arms of a 6-month-long PA promotion program. A minimal intervention group received a single written PA recommendation. The two remaining groups either received telephone coaching sessions (n = 12 calls) with or without additional short message service (SMS) prompting (n = 48 SMSs for each participant). Data assessment took place at baseline, at the end of the intervention, and after a six-month follow-up-period. The primary outcome of the study was self-reported PA. Objectively assessed PA, psychosocial determinants of PA, well-being, body mass index (BMI), and adherence were assessed as secondary outcomes. Conclusion. Findings of this three-arm study will provide insight into the short and long-term effects of coaching and prompting for PA promotion.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coaching and Prompting for Remote Physical Activity Promotion: Study Protocol of a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial (Movingcall)

Fischer

Donath

Zwygart

et al. 2019

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…steps Movisens -steps StepWatch , the share of each activity class expressed as the percentage of the day of recording, as well as the mean duration spent consecutively in one activity class, hereafter referred to as mean bout length. Subsequently, valid days of recording were identi ed following the recommendations by [41][42][43][44]: for a day of recording to be counted as valid, patients had to wear the sensor for at least ten hours and walk at least 200 steps. Only patients with at least four valid days of recording were included in further analytical steps.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving mobility and participation of older people with vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders in primary care using a care pathway: feasibility study and process evaluation

Seckler

Regauer

Krüger

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundCommunity-dwelling older people are frequently affected by vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders (VDB). We previously developed a Care Pathway (CPW) to improve their mobility and participation by offering standardised approaches for general practitioners (GPs) and physical therapists (PTs). We aimed to assess the feasibility of the intervention, its implementation strategy and the study procedures in preparation for the subsequent main trial.MethodsThis 12-week prospective cohort feasibility study was accompanied by a process evaluation designed according to the UK Medical Research Council’s guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Patients with VDB (≥ 65 years), GPs and PTs in primary care were included. Intervention consisted of a diagnostic screening checklist for GPs and a guide for PTs. Implementation strategy contained specific educational trainings and a telephone helpline. Data for mixed-method process evaluation was collected via standardised questionnaires, field notes and qualitative interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, qualitative data via content analysis.ResultsA total of five GP practices (seven single GPs), 10 PT practices and 22 patients were included in the study. The recruitment of GPs and patients was challenging (response rate GP practices: 27,8%; PT practices: 38,5%). 91% of patients and all health professionals completed the study. The health professionals responded well to the educational trainings, the utilization of the telephone helpline was low (one call each from GPs and PTs). Routine in the intervention’s application and positive attitudes were emphasised as facilitators for the interventions’ implementation, whereas lack of time was mentioned as a barrier. Despite of difficulties in GPs’ adherence to intervention protocol, GPs, PTs and patients benefited from the intervention. The patients’ treatment adherence to physical therapy was good. There were minor issues in data collection, but no unintended consequences.ConclusionAlthough the process evaluation provides good support for the feasibility of study procedures, the intervention and its implementation strategy, we identified a need of improvement in recruitment, the GPs’ intervention part and data collection procedures. Findings will inform the main trial to prove the interventions effectiveness in a cluster RCT.Trial registrationDeutsches Register Klinischer Studien (German Clinical Trials Register) DRKS00022918, date of registration: 03.09.2020 (retrospectively registered); Projektdatenbank Versorgungsforschung Deutschland (German registry Health Services Research) VfD_MobilE-PHY_17_003910, date of registration: 30.11.2017

show abstract

“…Pedersen et al (2009) uvádí, že individuální vzorce pohybové aktivity se liší den ode dne, a existuje pouze omezené poznání o tom, kolik dní objektivního měření je třeba pro získání dostatečné míry reliability. Gabrys et al (2015) uvádí, že pro hodnocení habituální pohybové aktivity je třeba provádět měření aspoň 7 po sobě jdoucích dní včetně víkendu. Podle Corder et al (2009), kteří se ve svém výzkumu zaměřili na věkovou skupinu 4-17 let, jsou sebehodnotící dotazníky validní pro sledování skupinové změny, avšak vykazují chyby při určování individuálních změn, což potvrzují i další výzkumy (Bonnefoy et al, 2001;Conway, Irwin, & Ainsworth, 2002;Washburn, Jacobsen, Sonko, Hill, & Donnelly, 2003).…”

Section: úVodunclassified

Hodnocení individuální míry pohybové aktivity dotazníky IPAQ a Wellness Inventory: případová studie

Stará¹,

Vespalec²

2017

StS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Akzelerometrie zur Erfassung körperlicher Aktivität

Cited by 36 publications

References 82 publications

Coaching and Prompting for Remote Physical Activity Promotion: Study Protocol of a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial (Movingcall)

Coaching and Prompting for Remote Physical Activity Promotion: Study Protocol of a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial (Movingcall)

Improving mobility and participation of older people with vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders in primary care using a care pathway: feasibility study and process evaluation

Hodnocení individuální míry pohybové aktivity dotazníky IPAQ a Wellness Inventory: případová studie

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About