Akko Birdsong and Robins, 1995

Patzner, Robert; Tassell, James L. Van; Kovačić, Marcelo; Kapoor, B. G.

doi:10.1201/b11397-28

Cited by 21 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, it has been suggested that occupiers of both habitats retain foraging and behavioural plasticity: coral dwelling gobies do not rely exclusively on client-gleaned items while sponge dwelling ones appear to engage opportunistically in cleaning (Côté & Soares, 2011). The risk of predation becomes a crucial factor here: sponge dwellers particularly those occupying inner positions in the sponge (dominants) seem to have a more protected live style (White et al, 2007).…”

Section: Stress Influence On Cleaner Fish Behavioural Plasticity: Carmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…That is the case of the Barbadian broadstripe cleaning goby E. prochilos (Böhlke and Robins 1968), which occurs on both sponge and live coral (Whiteman & Côté, 2004b), and its foraging mode and social systems differ between the two substrata. Coral-dwelling E. prochilos are active full-time cleaners (Arnal & Côté, 2000;Whiteman & Côté, 2002), are found living alone but mostly in pairs (male-female couples; Soares et al, 2009) or in small groups (Whiteman & Côté, 2002) and feed mostly on fish ectoparasites, while sponge-dwelling E. prochilos occur in large, highly aggressive dominance-structured groups and feed predominantly on polycheate worms that burrow within sponge tissues (Whiteman & Côté, 2004a;Côté & Soares, 2011).…”

Section: Stress Influence On Cleaner Fish Behavioural Plasticity: Carmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Integration of Sociality, Monoamines, and Stress Neuroendocrinology in Fish Models: Applications in the Neurosciences

Soares

Maximino

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Animal-focused research has been crucial for scientific advancement however, in this matter, rodents are still taking a starring role. Coming out from merely being supportive of evidence found in rodents, the use of fish models has slowly taken a more central role and expanded its overall contributions in areas such as social sciences, evolution, physiology, and recently in translational medical research. In neurosciences, zebrafish has been widely adopted, contributing to our understanding of the genetic control of brain processes, and the effects of pharmacological manipulations. However, discussion continues regarding the paradox of function versus structure, when fish and mammals are compared, and on the potentially evolutionarily conserved nature of behaviour across fish species. From the behavioural stand point we explored aversive/stress and social behaviour in selected fish models, and refer to the extensive contributions of stress and monoaminergic systems. We suggest that, in spite of marked neuroanatomical differences between fish and mammals, stress and sociality are conserved at the behavioural and molecular levels. We also suggest that stress and sociality are mediated by monoamines in predictable and non-trivial ways, and that monoamines could "bridge" the relationship between stress and social behaviour. To reconcile the level of divergence with the level of similarity, we need neuroanatomical, pharmacological, behavioural, and ecological studies conducted in the laboratory and in nature.These areas need to add to each other to enhance our understanding of fish behaviour and ultimately how this all may translate to better model systems for translational studies.

show abstract

Section: Stress Influence On Cleaner Fish Behavioural Plasticity: Carmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Stress Influence On Cleaner Fish Behavioural Plasticity: Carmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Integration of Sociality, Monoamines, and Stress Neuroendocrinology in Fish Models: Applications in the Neurosciences

Soares

Maximino

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, it has been suggested that occupiers of both habitats retain foraging and behavioural plasticity: coral dwelling gobies do not rely exclusively on client-gleaned items while sponge dwelling ones appear to engage opportunistically in cleaning (Côté & Soares, 2011) risk of predation becomes a crucial factor here: sponge dwellers particularly those occupying inner positions in the sponge (dominants) seem to have a more protected live style (White et al, 2007). Seemingly, it is solely amongst those that are "forced" out from the inner and richer areas (less competitive individuals) that opportunistic cleaning is observed (Whiteman & Côté, 2002).…”

Section: Stress Influence To Cleanermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…That is the case of the Barbadian broadstripe cleaning goby E. prochilos, which occurs on both sponge and live coral (Whiteman & Côté, 2004b), and its foraging mode and social systems differ between the two substrata. Coraldwelling E. prochilos are active full-time cleaners (Arnal & Côté, 2000;Whiteman & Côté, 2002), are found living alone but mostly in pairs (male-female couples; Soares et al, 2009) or in small groups (Whiteman & Côté, 2002) and feed mostly of fish ectoparasites, while sponge-dwelling E. prochilos occur in large, highly aggressive dominance-structured groups and feed predominantly on polycheate worms that burrow within sponge tissues (Whiteman & Côté, 2004a;Côté & Soares, 2011). …”

Section: Stress Influence To Cleanermentioning

confidence: 99%

The Integration of Sociality, Monoamines, and Stress Neuroendocrinology in Fish Models: Applications in the Neurosciences

Soares¹,

Maximino²

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Animal-focused research has been crucial for scientific advancement however, in this matter, rodents are still taking a starring role. Coming out from merely being supportive of evidence found in rodents, the use of fish models has slowly taken a more central role and expanded its overall contributions in areas such as social sciences, evolution, physiology, and recently in translational medical research. In neurosciences, zebrafish has been widely adopted, contributing to our understanding of the genetic control of brain processes, and the effects of pharmacological manipulations. However, discussion continues regarding the paradox of function versus structure, when fish and mammals are compared, and on the potentially evolutionarily conserved nature of behaviour across fish species. From the behavioural stand point we explorted aversive/stress and social behaviour in selected fish models, and refer to the extensive contributions of stress and monoaminergic systems. We suggest that, in spite of marked neuroanatomical differences between fish and mammals, stress and sociality are conserved at the behavioural and molecular levels. We also suggest that stress and sociality are mediated by monoamines in predictable and non-trivial ways, and that monoamines could “bridge” the relationship between stress and social behaviour. To reconcile the level of divergence with the level of similarity, neuroanatomy, pharmacology, behavioural analysis, and ecology studies conducted in the laboratory and in nature need to add to each other and enhance our understanding of fish behaviour and ultimately how this all may translate to better model systems for translational studies.

show abstract

“…). The family Labridae (wrasses, parrotfishes, and hogfishes) contains the greatest number of cleaner fishes, with 60 species (Baliga and Law ), while Gobiidae (gobies) contains the second most, with 17 cleaner species (Côté and Soares ). Cleaning symbioses are mutually beneficial, complex interspecific relationships between cleaner and client (Limbaugh ; Feder ; Losey ).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Co‐evolution of cleaning and feeding morphology in western Atlantic and eastern Pacific gobies

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cleaning symbioses are mutualistic relationships where cleaners remove and consume ectoparasites from their clients. Cleaning behavior is rare in fishes and is a highly specialized feeding strategy only observed in around 200 species. Cleaner fishes vary in their degree of specialization, ranging from species that clean as juveniles or facultatively as adults, to nearly obligate or dedicated cleaners. Here, we investigate whether these different levels of trophic specialization correspond with similar changes in feeding morphology. Specifically, we model the evolution of cleaning behavior across the family Gobiidae, which contains the most speciose radiation of dedicated and facultative cleaner fishes. We compared the cranial morphology and dentition of cleaners and non‐cleaners across the phylogeny of cleaning gobies and found that facultative cleaners independently evolved four times and have converged on an intermediate morphology relative to that of dedicated cleaners and non‐cleaning generalists. This is consistent with their more flexible feeding habits. Cleaner gobies also possess a distinct tooth morphology, which suggests they are adapted for scraping parasites off their clients and show little similarity to other cleaner clades. We propose that evolutionary history and pre‐adaptation underlie the morphological and ecological diversification of cleaner fishes.

show abstract

Akko Birdsong and Robins, 1995

Cited by 21 publications

References 72 publications

The Integration of Sociality, Monoamines, and Stress Neuroendocrinology in Fish Models: Applications in the Neurosciences

The Integration of Sociality, Monoamines, and Stress Neuroendocrinology in Fish Models: Applications in the Neurosciences

The Integration of Sociality, Monoamines, and Stress Neuroendocrinology in Fish Models: Applications in the Neurosciences

Co‐evolution of cleaning and feeding morphology in western Atlantic and eastern Pacific gobies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About