Ake on Political Obligation and Political Dissent: A Gloss

Wand, Bernard

doi:10.1017/s0008423900027141

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ake goes on to argue that citizens actually have a duty to disobey. Bernard Wand criticises Ake's justification for the duty to disobey, but offers another account that also results in the obligation to resist governments that violate individual rights (Wand, 1970). 44.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Accountability in Public Policy Partnerships

Steets

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Book -Published VersionAccountability in public policy partnerships Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Accountability in Public Policy Partnerships

Steets

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Accountability in Public Policy Partnerships

Steets¹

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contents 3 Why Organisations Ought to be Accountable 3.1 Major justifications for accountability 3.1.1 Consequentialist justifications 3.1.2 Power and stakeholder theory 3.1.3 Power and the democratic deficit 3.2 The alternative: Justifying accountability through delegation 3.2.1 Delegation and the duty to act in the best interest of the principal 3.2.2 Delegation and the need for appropriate accountability mechanisms 3.2.3 Ex-post and hypothetical delegation 3.3 The advantages of justifying accountability through delegation 3.4 Form should follow function 4 Partnerships in Practice 4.1 Partnership types … 4.1.1 Advocacy and awareness-raising partnerships 4.1.2 Rule setting and regulation partnerships 4.1.3 Policy implementation partnerships 4.1.4 Information-generating partnerships 4.2 … and their accountability arrangements 4.2.1 Legal and fiscal accountability arrangements 4.2.2 Financial accountability 4.2.3 Elements of process accountability 4.2.4 Accountability for outcomes 4.2.5 Accountability through independence and professionalism 4.2.6 Overview over partnerships and their main accountability arrangements 5 Concrete Partnership Accountability Standards 5.1 Advocacy and awareness-raising partnerships: Basic standards for all partnerships 5.1.1 Accountability for complying with relevant rules and regulations 5.1.1.1 Choose a well-governed host organisation 5.1.1.2 Adopt clear internal rules vi Contents 5.1.1.3 Create an effective oversight body with the ability to apply sanctions 5.1.2 Financial accountability 5.1.2.1 Adopt a system of internal financial controls 5.1.2.2 Adopt accounting and reporting policies complying with donor demands and generating reliable, relevant, comparable and understandable information 5.1.2.3 Conduct independent audits for large partnerships 5.1.3 Accountability for working towards the partnership's mission 5.1.3.1 Define a clear mission 5.1.3.2 Orient partnership activities along the mission

show abstract

Ake on Political Obligation and Political Dissent: A Gloss

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Accountability in Public Policy Partnerships

Accountability in Public Policy Partnerships

Accountability in Public Policy Partnerships

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About