1996
DOI: 10.1051/forest:19960107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ajustement d'un modèle hauteur-circonférence pour l'épicéa commun. Effet de la densité

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For these groups, a local basal area G was calculated (sum of individual basal areas/sum of space available for each tree). In agreement with Deleuze et al [5] these data showed that dominant height Ho was not affected by density. Hence all densities were pooled together when computing dominant height for each plot.…”
Section: Vercel's Trialsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For these groups, a local basal area G was calculated (sum of individual basal areas/sum of space available for each tree). In agreement with Deleuze et al [5] these data showed that dominant height Ho was not affected by density. Hence all densities were pooled together when computing dominant height for each plot.…”
Section: Vercel's Trialsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This ''first phase of growth' ' (1994-1996) is due to weak apical dominance under hormonal control (Cabanettes and Rapp, 1981a) and is influenced by ''planting crisis'' effects (Kremer and Roussel, 1986). Moreover, the relationship between height growth and radial growth variables evolves with seedling age (Lappi, 1997), and follows the two growth phases distinguished; it appears to discriminate the two Provençal provenances in the second phase of growth (1997)(1998)(1999) but not in the first one may change as competition among seedlings increases (Deleuze et al, 1996). These conclusions agree with the analyses of Beguin and Raulier (1995) and those of Cañadas Dias et al (2000).…”
Section: Comparison Of Provenancesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At the time of the study, and for some practical reasons, we had to sample in an experimental design described in [11][12][13][14] (pure and even-aged stand, controlled mating, continuous variation of stand density). Dreyfus [13] showed that this experimental design generated a very high variability of stem dimensions (Tab.…”
Section: Lorraine Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%