1996
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01305-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airy minimum crossing θcm = 90° at Elab = 124 MeV for the system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24]). In addition, the elastic 16 O+ 16 O data at E lab = 124 and 145 MeV have been measured by Sugiyama et al at JAERI (Tokai) [29,30]. The JAERI data were used to investigate the evolution of the Airy interference pattern in the excitation function at lower energies [30].…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[24]). In addition, the elastic 16 O+ 16 O data at E lab = 124 and 145 MeV have been measured by Sugiyama et al at JAERI (Tokai) [29,30]. The JAERI data were used to investigate the evolution of the Airy interference pattern in the excitation function at lower energies [30].…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decomposition of the unsymmetrized 16 O+ 16 O elastic scattering cross section (thick solid curves) at E lab = 124 and 145 MeV into the nearside (dotted curves) and farside (solid curves) components using Fuller's method [26]. The WoodsSaxon squared (WS2) potentials, which give the best fit to the data measured at these energies by Sugiyama et al [29,30], have been used in the OM calculation. Ak indicates the k-th order of the Airy minimum in the farside cross section.…”
Section: The Farside Scattering and The Airy Oscillation Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the 90°excitation functions display gross structure, and/or the angular distributions show a series of broad humps separated by deep minima; at sufficiently high incident energy the differential cross sections decrease exponentially at large angles [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important for a folding model based on the complex G-matrix, because the imaginary part of the G-matrix is expected to simulate the effect of single-particle-like excitations of finite nuclear systems through NN pair-scattering correlations and the effect of coherent, collective excitations of a finite nucleus may not be included in the imaginary part of the G-matrix. Therefore, the 16 O + 16 O system is one of the ideal benchmark systems to test the validity of interaction models; in fact, a number of interaction models, either purely phenomenological [30][31][32] or microscopic in various senses [12,13,22,23], have been tested for decades on this system as a milestone to be cleared.…”
Section: O + 16 O Elastic Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%