2009
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a94acb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airway Stenosis-Related Increase of Pulmonary Pressure During High-Frequency Jet Ventilation Depends on Injector’s Position

Abstract: This study in a lung model suggests that placing an injector more than 8 cm proximal to a laryngotracheal stenosis will prevent changes in intrapulmonary pressure related to the degree of stenosis or driving pressure during HFJV. The location of the injector chosen for clinical care should balance the need for effective ventilation with the risk of barotrauma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From their results from bench studies, some claim that detrimental intrapulmonary pressures occur during prestenotic JV, 32,33 whereas others report intrapulmonary pressures within acceptable limits. Although we noted a concomitant underestimation of intrapulmonary PEEP, we believe that prestenotic JV with (1) a jet injector position at sufficient distance from the stenotic segment 35 and (2) airway pressure monitoring more than 6 cm distal of the jet injector 36 help prevent inadvertently high intrapulmonary peak pressure and its complications in subjects with severe airway obstruction. Although we noted a concomitant underestimation of intrapulmonary PEEP, we believe that prestenotic JV with (1) a jet injector position at sufficient distance from the stenotic segment 35 and (2) airway pressure monitoring more than 6 cm distal of the jet injector 36 help prevent inadvertently high intrapulmonary peak pressure and its complications in subjects with severe airway obstruction.…”
Section: Perioperative Medicinementioning
confidence: 77%
“…From their results from bench studies, some claim that detrimental intrapulmonary pressures occur during prestenotic JV, 32,33 whereas others report intrapulmonary pressures within acceptable limits. Although we noted a concomitant underestimation of intrapulmonary PEEP, we believe that prestenotic JV with (1) a jet injector position at sufficient distance from the stenotic segment 35 and (2) airway pressure monitoring more than 6 cm distal of the jet injector 36 help prevent inadvertently high intrapulmonary peak pressure and its complications in subjects with severe airway obstruction. Although we noted a concomitant underestimation of intrapulmonary PEEP, we believe that prestenotic JV with (1) a jet injector position at sufficient distance from the stenotic segment 35 and (2) airway pressure monitoring more than 6 cm distal of the jet injector 36 help prevent inadvertently high intrapulmonary peak pressure and its complications in subjects with severe airway obstruction.…”
Section: Perioperative Medicinementioning
confidence: 77%
“…A previous report by Ihra et al. (19) demonstrated in an adult trachea–lung model that the distance between the jet nozzle and the airway stenosis influences airway pressure, so that airway pressures decrease with increasing distance to the stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such pressures are common and necessary to overcome the high resistance associated with the application of normal tidal volumes via small bore cannulae and catheters and to facilitate effective gas exchange during HPSV. Although I completely agree with Hamaekers' general remarks on the safety issues of jet ventilation, especially on the underestimated risk of self-assembled jet devices, it would have been helpful to determine real airway pressures in an appropriate test system (5). Finally, PACT must not be interpreted as airway pressure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%