2014
DOI: 10.1080/14733315.2014.11684026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airtightness in New and Retrofitted U.S. Army Buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to this large energy penalty, extensive research has been performed to develop methods for determining the air leakage rate of building envelopes [1][2][3][4][5]. Among these, blower door tests [6] are most commonly used to gather air leakage measurements of commercial buildings for research purposes [7] or to comply with building code requirements [8][9][10]. Additionally, various methods have been proposed to simulate air leakage in buildings [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this large energy penalty, extensive research has been performed to develop methods for determining the air leakage rate of building envelopes [1][2][3][4][5]. Among these, blower door tests [6] are most commonly used to gather air leakage measurements of commercial buildings for research purposes [7] or to comply with building code requirements [8][9][10]. Additionally, various methods have been proposed to simulate air leakage in buildings [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation seems to show that although codes focus on air barrier materials, unexpected defects affecting the airtightness of the whole building are still noticed onsite [9,16,22,26]. However, by developing appropriate testing and inspection measures, it is possible to achieve excellent leakage performance [22,27] as demonstrated by USACE's newest buildings with their average leakage rate of 0.9 L/s•m 2 @ 75 Pa [28]. The industrialized context of prefabricated structures favors the integration of more stringent monitoring as shown by the USACE buildings [13,27,28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by developing appropriate testing and inspection measures, it is possible to achieve excellent leakage performance [22,27] as demonstrated by USACE's newest buildings with their average leakage rate of 0.9 L/s•m 2 @ 75 Pa [28]. The industrialized context of prefabricated structures favors the integration of more stringent monitoring as shown by the USACE buildings [13,27,28]. This is especially true for modular structures that are 90% complete in industry and can rely on a controlled environment for the total completion of more complex sealing details [10,29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%