2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aircraft Status Supervision System Concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, overcoming this problem was a subject of research (Żugaj 2017). Similar systems that constantly monitor and react to various types of malfunctions are strongly developed around the world (Abdi and Labib 2003;Chen and Zhang 2012;Narkiewicz et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, overcoming this problem was a subject of research (Żugaj 2017). Similar systems that constantly monitor and react to various types of malfunctions are strongly developed around the world (Abdi and Labib 2003;Chen and Zhang 2012;Narkiewicz et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is less expected that radar-vectoring or go-around will be required due to too low separation. This concept could also contribute to the Aicraft Supervision System Concept [5] that assesses overall external and internal aircraft status. Implementation of this approach requires detailed analysis of past air traffic and study of wide range of possible scenarios, with a focus on separations between aircraft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%