Proceedings of the 5th International Mobile Multimedia Communications Conference 2009
DOI: 10.4108/icst.mobimedia2009.7904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aircraft identification by unions of ISAR images

Abstract: We offer an algorithm that can identify aircraft categories from Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar (ISAR) images that use both the radar reflection pulse shape, which includes the duration or size of the radar pulse that is reflected, and the Doppler shifts of different parts of the aircraft caused by rotational motions of the aircraft as it maneuvers. We investigated the practicality of determining which of seven different aircraft categories a radar return indicates. The object of this research is to very qui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained with the both proposed classification methods are compared testing the same aircraft model sets. The second proposed union algorithm [10] shows itself to be much more successful in correct and efficient classification than the algorithm described in [8] and [9]. The percent of correctly classified images with the union method is three to thirty times higher than with the method proposed in [8] and [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained with the both proposed classification methods are compared testing the same aircraft model sets. The second proposed union algorithm [10] shows itself to be much more successful in correct and efficient classification than the algorithm described in [8] and [9]. The percent of correctly classified images with the union method is three to thirty times higher than with the method proposed in [8] and [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Category 4 had approximately 2.2% error, Category 1 had less than 1% error and Category 5 had less then 1/3 % error. The union algorithm [10] is far superior not only in accuracy but also in speed to the results obtained with classification method described in [8] and [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations