2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airborne visualization and quantification of discrete methane sources in the environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methane airborne mapper (MAMAP) retrieves methane in the SWIR at 1.6 µm, similar to SCIAMACHY, but currently lacks imaging capabilities. Imaging spectrometers initially designed for surface remote sensing have been shown to detect methane plumes with horizontal resolution as fine as 1 m either in the SWIR using the strong 2.3 µm band (Roberts et al, 2010;Thorpe et al, 2016) or in the TIR (Tratt et al, 2014;Hulley et al, 2016). These imaging spectrometers such as AVIRIS-NG (SWIR) and MAKO or HyTES (TIR) have much coarser spectral resolution than MAMAP or current satellite instruments (e.g., 5 nm for AVIRIS-NG).…”
Section: Observing Requirements For Regional and Point Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methane airborne mapper (MAMAP) retrieves methane in the SWIR at 1.6 µm, similar to SCIAMACHY, but currently lacks imaging capabilities. Imaging spectrometers initially designed for surface remote sensing have been shown to detect methane plumes with horizontal resolution as fine as 1 m either in the SWIR using the strong 2.3 µm band (Roberts et al, 2010;Thorpe et al, 2016) or in the TIR (Tratt et al, 2014;Hulley et al, 2016). These imaging spectrometers such as AVIRIS-NG (SWIR) and MAKO or HyTES (TIR) have much coarser spectral resolution than MAMAP or current satellite instruments (e.g., 5 nm for AVIRIS-NG).…”
Section: Observing Requirements For Regional and Point Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different sets of assumptions and sampling strategies are employed, but the overall goal is to sample the main dispersion routes of the surface emissions as they make their way into the overlying atmosphere after first accumulating near the surface. The scales that can be addressed by this method are from a few kilometers (Alfieri et al, 2010;Hacker et al, 2016;Hiller et al, 2014;Tratt et al, 2014) to tens of kilometers (Caulton et al, 2014;Karion et al, 2013;Wratt et al, 2001) to even potentially hundreds of kilometers (Beswick et al, 1998;Chang et al, 2014), and this approach has been the focus of recent measurements in natural gas production basins. These basins present a source apportionment challenge in that emissions from multiple sources (agriculture, oil and gas wells, geologic seepage, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While other researchers have used far more sophisticated and expensive systems for mapping methane [35], the routine implementation of these systems for monitoring has not occurred. To make meaningful progress on identification and quantification of methane emissions from landfills and natural gas infrastructure, monitoring systems that are easier and less expensive to deploy are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One demonstration trial involved surveying a section of a pipeline in Alaska [32]. Some applications were mainly based on using a single sensor, such as laser sensor [33] gas filter [34] and hyperspectral imaging technology [35], while others used sensor fusion algorithms to fuse the measurements gathered from a laser sensor and an electro-optical sensor [36]. Lehmann et al [37] reported a more specific use of UAV for remote sensing of methane concentration using camera system for environmental studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%