2003
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2003.1188909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airborne/spacebased radar STAP using a structured covariance matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we propose a more straightforward method than that in [21] and [22] to solve (19). Let (20) and note that…”
Section: Robust Fmlacc Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we propose a more straightforward method than that in [21] and [22] to solve (19). Let (20) and note that…”
Section: Robust Fmlacc Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R ww is estimated from available sensor data, or from receiver output signals with the receiver input blocked, or other means. R αα is estimated adaptively using previously-recorded data [20], a priori information [21], structured covariance techniques [22], analytical modeling techniques [23,24], or combinations of these methods. In fact, the methodology proposed here benefits directly from the large number of covariance estimation techniques developed in the adaptive array and space-time adaptive processing (STAP) areas.…”
Section: Waveform Selection Using Mutual Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clutter suppression algorithms under nonstationary scenario, including non-side looking arrays (Wang et al 1997), conformal arrays (Zatman 2000;Xie and Wang 2009) and distributed arrays (Melvin et al 2003;Lapierre et al 2003), have also been studied over these years. In addition, several low-sample support algorithms have been proposed for sample shortness situations (Parker and Swindlehurst 2003;Roman et al 2000;Gerlach and Picciolo 2003;Melvin et al 1998;Befgin et al 2006;Zhao et al 2014). The aforementioned methods can be used only for a certain nonhomogenerous scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%