2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airborne sound insulation between dwellings, from 50 vs. 100 Hz – A compilation of Swedish field surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Other related examples are the acoustic comfort evaluation in France with multi-storey lightweight buildings, 9 the Finnish studies of occupants' satisfaction with the sound insulation focused on wall constructions, 10 and the Swedish investigation about airborne sound insulation between dwellings. 11 Common conclusions in these studies are that occupants in general are rather satisfied by the acoustic comfort in their homes. Exceptions exist though, and impact sound is repeatedly pointed out as being a source of great annoyance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 Other related examples are the acoustic comfort evaluation in France with multi-storey lightweight buildings, 9 the Finnish studies of occupants' satisfaction with the sound insulation focused on wall constructions, 10 and the Swedish investigation about airborne sound insulation between dwellings. 11 Common conclusions in these studies are that occupants in general are rather satisfied by the acoustic comfort in their homes. Exceptions exist though, and impact sound is repeatedly pointed out as being a source of great annoyance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic indoor quality as perceived by occupants of multi-family houses has been investigated in Sweden through three successive research projects (AkuLite, Aku20 and AkuTimber) running from 2010 to 2021. Parts of the results, primarily focused on impact sound insulation, [16][17][18] but to some extent also on airborne sound insulation, 11 have so far been presented by the authors. A unique feature with the impact sound related work [16][17][18] is that frequencies as low as 20 Hz were considered in the measurements and in the relation to subjectively rated annoyance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In this context, several authors have investigated acoustic comfort in residential buildings, for example, in Norway, 3 or comfort in timber-based buildings in Sweden 4 and several researchers investigated the effect of low frequencies on dwellers. 5,6 Many reports from consulting companies and published scientific studies [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] have shown that even if the requirements on sound insulation defined through R w are fulfilled, good acoustic comfort in dwellings is not guaranteed. One of the drawbacks of R w is that it does not take into account noise components below 100 Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reports from consulting companies and published scientific studies 718 have shown that even if the requirements on sound insulation defined through R w are fulfilled, good acoustic comfort in dwellings is not guaranteed. One of the drawbacks of R w is that it does not take into account noise components below 100 Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last years, an increased interest in sound insulation at low frequencies can be observed. Although in current standards the assessment of sound insulation in the frequency range down to 50Hz is still optional [1,2], most studies recommend the inclusion of frequencies below 100 Hz [3,4]. However, it is also well known that measurents of the sound reduction index according to the standard ISO 10140:2010 [5] at frequencies below 100 Hz are affected by a large uncertainty [6,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%