We summarize the results from the various measurements and the inter-sampler comparisons from Southeastern Aerosol and Visibility Study (SEAVS), a study with one of its objectives to test for closure among chemical, gravimetric and optical measurements of atmospheric aerosol particles. Sulfate and organics are the dominant components IMPLICATIONS PM 2.5 consists of hundreds of compounds that are difficult to measure individually. Therefore, for almost two decades, PM 2.5 composition has been expressed in terms of three broad constituent categories (ions; elemental carbon and organics; and crustal dust). Any lack of closure in PM 2.5 mass (i.e., constituent concentrations not adding up to gravimetrically measured PM 2.5 ) was presumed to be due to water present in the samples and measurement error. Here we show that this presumption is not universally correct and that errors in extrapolating organic mass from organic carbon measurements may be plausible explanation. With the public and private sectors on the verge of investing substantial resources in fine PM characterization studies in the wake of new U.S. PM 2.5 ambient standard, our results underscore the urgency for producing more reliable technology for measuring organics.of the SEAVS fine particles (nominally, particles with aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 µm) but between 28 and 42% (range over various samplers) of the gravimetrically measured total fine particle concentration is unidentified by the chemical measurements. Estimates of water associated with inorganic components and measurement imprecision do not totally explain the observed difference between gravimetric and chemical measurements. We examine the theoretical and empirical basis for assumptions commonly made in the published literature to extrapolate total fine particle concentration on the basis of chemical measurements of ions, carbon and elements.We then explore the more general question of closure using the SEAVS data as well as data from other, similar studies reported in the literature. In so combining the SEAVS measurements with other similar studies, we find a strong association between organic carbon and the unidentified component, that is, the fraction of the total fine particle concentration not identified by chemical measurements. We offer several tenable hypotheses for the relationship between the organic and unidentified components that deserve to be tested in future work. Specifically, we hypothesize that (1) errors in the sampling and analysis of organic carbon; (2) estimates of organic mass from measurements Andrews et al.