2015
DOI: 10.3390/rs70708348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airborne LiDAR Detects Selectively Logged Tropical Forest Even in an Advanced Stage of Recovery

Abstract: Identifying historical forest disturbances is difficult, especially in selectively logged areas. LiDAR is able to measure fine-scale variations in forest structure over multiple kilometers. We use LiDAR data from ca. 16 km 2 of forest in Sierra Leone, West Africa, to discriminate areas of old-growth from areas recovering from selective logging for 23 years. We examined canopy height variation and gap size distributions. We found that though recovering blocks of forest differed little in height from old-growth … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, there is limited ground-based analysis on those relationships over tropical regions, but they report probability density functions with shapes similar to the ones shown in Fig. 8c and d. In particular, tropical tree height distributions are characterized by a right-skewed distribution with the peak corresponding to mid-range trees (Kent, Lindsell, Laurin, Valentini, & Coomes, 2015;Shimizu et al, 2014), which is around 10-15 m over the BCI 50ha plot according to the AMS3D (Fig. 8c).…”
Section: Distribution Of Individual Tree Sizementioning
confidence: 77%
“…In fact, there is limited ground-based analysis on those relationships over tropical regions, but they report probability density functions with shapes similar to the ones shown in Fig. 8c and d. In particular, tropical tree height distributions are characterized by a right-skewed distribution with the peak corresponding to mid-range trees (Kent, Lindsell, Laurin, Valentini, & Coomes, 2015;Shimizu et al, 2014), which is around 10-15 m over the BCI 50ha plot according to the AMS3D (Fig. 8c).…”
Section: Distribution Of Individual Tree Sizementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Supporting these findings, Kent et al. () recently used airborne LiDAR imagery covering a vast swathe of Gola forest to show that these same logging operations left a clear and detectable fingerprint on the vertical structure of the forest canopy. Conversely, our results do not suggest that logging activities have had a long‐lasting impact on tree diversity in Gola (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Logging, for example, can impact AWP in a number of ways, including damaging live trees and altering the structure of the canopy (Okuda et al 2003;Asner et al 2004;Blanc et al 2009;West et al 2014), through soil impoverishment as a result of erosion and nutrient leaching (Chazdon 2003), and by facilitating the establishment of lianas (Schnitzer and Bongers 2011;Dur an et al 2013). One process in particularthe removal of large diameter trees (Okuda et al 2003;Bonnell et al 2011;Osazuwa-Peters et al 2015)can have a sizable and long-lasting impact on AWP, as large trees contribute disproportionately to productivity (Slik et al 2013;Michaletz et al 2014;Stephenson et al 2014) and it can take decades for surviving trees to take their place in the canopy (Martin et al 2013;Kent et al 2015;Osazuwa-Peters et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest spatial structure from LiDAR datasets has been extensively studied with the aim of characterizing forest types using texture metrics [23]. Also forest disturbance has been addressed using these techniques (e.g., selective logging: [52,53]). Canopy grain analysis from FOTO applied to LiDAR derived Canopy Height Model (CHM) and Digital Surface Model (DSM) was also used to generate metrics related to structure and to ultimately improve above-ground biomass prediction [32,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%